Comment 16 for bug 362691

Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :

Evan, please rewrite the changelog to not refer to a previous one (since that just got eradicated), document it properly standing on its own. You also need to refer to the bug number.

Also, FWIW, the new patch is much more invasive than the previous one, and much more prone to errors. The first one looked okay, the bug just misses testing instructions.