Vibhav,
I've taken a look at your diff (Revised Debdiff in comment 2 above).
I have the following comments:
a.) Thank you for your work.
b.) as per IRC conversation [1], please do open a debian bug regarding the Ubuntu delta in debian/patches/01_fix-as-needed- linking.diff, and then link the resulting debian bug to this bug.
c.) it seems that you've re-named the debian patch in debian/patches/fillval to fillval.diff . I think it best to leave it as it is.
d.) In debian/patches/series, you have 01_fix-as-needed-linking.diff first. Generally, I think in ubuntu delta we usually apply the Ubuntu patches last.
e.) Keep the debian/changelog entries from debian as their own entries, rather than as sub-elements of the Ubuntu merge entry.
Vibhav, patches/ 01_fix- as-needed- linking.diff, and then link the resulting debian bug to this bug. patches/ fillval to fillval.diff . I think it best to leave it as it is. patches/ series, you have 01_fix- as-needed- linking. diff first. Generally, I think in ubuntu delta we usually apply the Ubuntu patches last.
I've taken a look at your diff (Revised Debdiff in comment 2 above).
I have the following comments:
a.) Thank you for your work.
b.) as per IRC conversation [1], please do open a debian bug regarding the Ubuntu delta in debian/
c.) it seems that you've re-named the debian patch in debian/
d.) In debian/
e.) Keep the debian/changelog entries from debian as their own entries, rather than as sub-elements of the Ubuntu merge entry.
-- irclogs. ubuntu. com/2012/ 06/06/% 23ubuntu- devel.html# t16:44
[1] http://