Comment 8 for bug 375345

Revision history for this message
David D Lowe (flimm) wrote : Re: "Ubuntu One" name infringes on Ubuntu trademark policy and creates confusion

Just the company name "Canonical" is enough to associate the product with Ubuntu anyway. Why not call it "Canonical One"? That way, you're advertising the company too.
According to canonical.com, "Our distribution Ubuntu is a community developed and supported project." But exactly how is the community involved in Ubuntu One? How does Ubuntu One meet the Ubuntu philosophy? How is this project more worthy of the trademark then community driven U-lite, which was forced to change its name from UbuntuLite?