in the setup below, noticed that subnet "c37d9f81-eede-4ac6-9397-d10c240a3d11" some how got two DHCP address assignments. There is only a single host running quantum-dhcp-agent. This agent was probably restarted several time while rebooting the system (this is an install from ubuntu packages). My understanding is that this should not happen. This may mess up the logic on the nova side for poking iptables holes to allow VMs to receive DHCP, or it may be harmless, I'm not sure.
root@openstack-cc:~# quantum port-list -c device_owner -c fixed_ips
+--------------------------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| device_owner | fixed_ips |
+--------------------------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| network:dhcp | {"subnet_id": "f9bbbb9b-5d93-4228-9d3b-0c58f3ba2fb6", "ip_address": "192.168.0.2"} |
| network:router_interface | {"subnet_id": "c37d9f81-eede-4ac6-9397-d10c240a3d11", "ip_address": "60.0.0.1"} |
| compute:nova | {"subnet_id": "c37d9f81-eede-4ac6-9397-d10c240a3d11", "ip_address": "60.0.0.3"} |
| network:router_gateway | {"subnet_id": "f9bbbb9b-5d93-4228-9d3b-0c58f3ba2fb6", "ip_address": "192.168.0.4"} |
| network:dhcp | {"subnet_id": "c37d9f81-eede-4ac6-9397-d10c240a3d11", "ip_address": "60.0.0.2"} |
| network:dhcp | {"subnet_id": "c37d9f81-eede-4ac6-9397-d10c240a3d11", "ip_address": "60.0.0.4"} |
| compute:nova | {"subnet_id": "bb474b8f-df9c-444c-8782-8bcf7bacbd1c", "ip_address": "61.0.0.3"} |
| network:dhcp | {"subnet_id": "bb474b8f-df9c-444c-8782-8bcf7bacbd1c", "ip_address": "61.0.0.2"} |
| compute:nova | {"subnet_id": "f9bbbb9b-5d93-4228-9d3b-0c58f3ba2fb6", "ip_address": "192.168.0.5"} |
| network:router_interface | {"subnet_id": "bb474b8f-df9c-444c-8782-8bcf7bacbd1c", "ip_address": "61.0.0.1"} |
| network:router_gateway | {"subnet_id": "f9bbbb9b-5d93-4228-9d3b-0c58f3ba2fb6", "ip_address": "192.168.0.3"} |
+--------------------------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
mark, could you comment here? Thanks.