not publication quality???
Bug #111217 reported by
John Pye
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| matplotlib (Debian) |
Fix Released
|
Unknown
|
|||
| matplotlib (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
Bug Description
I am rather puzzled by the comment that has appeared in the matplotlib summary in the package description. It says:
"Although the goal of publication quality is not yet attained, the library does produce high quality 2D plots"
In whose opinion? I have used numerous matplotlib plots in my thesis, and I very much hope it is of publication quality...
But seriously: where does this opinion come from? If it comes from the packager, what authority do that have to make this sort of call?
Revision history for this message
| Emmet Hikory (persia) wrote | #1 |
| Changed in matplotlib: | |
| status: | Unconfirmed → Confirmed |
| Changed in matplotlib: | |
| status: | Unknown → Unconfirmed |
| Changed in matplotlib: | |
| status: | New → Fix Released |
Revision history for this message
| Steve Kowalik (stevenk) wrote | #2 |
| Changed in matplotlib: | |
| status: | Confirmed → Fix Released |
To post a comment you must log in.
The description in this case also directly contradicts the contents of /usr/share/