MARC editor right-click authority search is confusing

Bug #1175308 reported by Mike Rylander
16
This bug affects 3 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Evergreen
Fix Released
Medium
Unassigned
2.3
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned
2.4
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

From the commit message at the top of http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=working/Evergreen.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/user/miker/marcedit-authority-preceding-sf-search :

    Search clicked /and/ preceding sf values

    When looking for authority records to control a bib field, we currently
    search using exactly, and only, the subfield that was clicked. This
    commit changes that so that the full field up to and including the clicked
    subfield is used in the simple authority heading search we perform to find
    the best-match (pivot) authority record.

tags: added: authority
Revision history for this message
Yamil (ysuarez) wrote :

Mike,

Let me re-state what you wrote to see if I understand.

Your are proposing that if I have an authority controlled bib tag 650 (subject) like this...

650 $a Jazz $zFrance $zParis

and if I click inside any of the subfields, the context menu's search results will be based on all of the sub-fields present at the time of the right-click, instead of just the subfield I clicked on?

If so, Berklee would love to see this change.

Ben Shum (bshum)
Changed in evergreen:
status: New → Triaged
importance: Undecided → Medium
Revision history for this message
Mike Rylander (mrylander) wrote :

Yamil,

Close to what you said, yes. Given your example, if you click on Paris it will search for "Jazz France Paris", but if you click on France it will search for just "Jazz France". This allows you to decide how much specificity you want to search with.

Dan Wells (dbw2)
Changed in evergreen:
milestone: 2.5.0-m1 → 2.5.0-m2
Revision history for this message
Lebbeous Fogle-Weekley (lebbeous) wrote :

From what I hear, this new behavior is what catalogers have always hoped for / expected, and the old behavior was seen as a bug. Therefore I think this merits a backport. It works, and it's in master, rel_2_4 and rel_2_3.

Changed in evergreen:
status: Triaged → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Gislaine Hamelin (gislaine-hamelin) wrote :

Question: Will this fix be available in 2.5? (new to the bug lingo)

Revision history for this message
Kathy Lussier (klussier) wrote :

Yes, this fix will be available in 2.5 and should also be available in 2.4.1 and 2.3.8 as well.

Hope this helps!
Kathy

Ben Shum (bshum)
Changed in evergreen:
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.