No 'active' boolean fields for res.partner.bank account and account.journal
Bug #1180803 reported by
Frederic Clementi - Camptocamp
This bug affects 1 person
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Odoo Addons (MOVED TO GITHUB) |
Confirmed
|
Wishlist
|
OpenERP R&D Addons Team 3 |
Bug Description
There no way to 'archive' old bank account or old journals since there is no active field on these objects.
Is it possible to add these fileds please ?
Thanks
Frederic
Related branches
lp:~camptocamp/openobject-server/7.0-fix-1180803
Ready for review
for merging
into
lp:openobject-server/7.0
- OpenERP Core Team: Pending requested
-
Diff: 51 lines (+7/-3)2 files modifiedopenerp/addons/base/res/res_bank.py (+5/-3)
openerp/addons/base/res/res_bank_view.xml (+2/-0)
lp:~camptocamp/openobject-addons/7.0-fix-1180803
Rejected
for merging
into
lp:openobject-addons/7.0
- Martin Trigaux (OpenERP) (community): Disapprove
- Alexandre Fayolle - camptocamp (community): Approve (code review, no test)
-
Diff: 32 lines (+3/-1)2 files modifiedaccount/account.py (+2/-1)
account/account_view.xml (+1/-0)
lp:~camptocamp/ocb-addons/7.0-fix-bug-1180803
- Stefan Rijnhart (Opener): Approve
-
Diff: 32 lines (+3/-1)2 files modifiedaccount/account.py (+2/-1)
account/account_view.xml (+1/-0)
lp:~camptocamp/ocb-server/7.0-fix-1180803
- Holger Brunn (Therp): Approve (code review)
- Stefan Rijnhart (Opener): Approve
-
Diff: 34 lines (+5/-1)2 files modifiedopenerp/addons/base/res/res_bank.py (+3/-1)
openerp/addons/base/res/res_bank_view.xml (+2/-0)
Changed in openobject-addons: | |
assignee: | nobody → OpenERP R&D Addons Team 3 (openerp-dev-addons3) |
importance: | Undecided → Wishlist |
status: | New → Confirmed |
Changed in openobject-addons: | |
assignee: | OpenERP R&D Addons Team 3 (openerp-dev-addons3) → OpenERP Publisher's Warranty Team (openerp-opw) |
tags: | added: maintenance |
To post a comment you must log in.
Hello Frederic,
As per stable version term and condition, adding a new fields are not allowed. because it will reflect the schema.
I have attached patch in your ticket . please have a look.
R&D team will take decision on it. So I'm reassigning it to trunk.
Thanks lot..!!