scan-for-operator script fails: org.ofono.Error.Failed: Operation failed
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ofono (Ubuntu) |
Invalid
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
Image 160, mako
phablet@
Scanning operators on modem /ril_0...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/
operators = netreg.
File "/usr/lib/
return self._proxy_
File "/usr/lib/
**keywords)
File "/usr/lib/
message, timeout)
dbus.exceptions
phablet@
ofono:
Installed: 1.12+bzr6853-
Candidate: 1.12+bzr6853-
Version table:
*** 1.12+bzr6853-
500 http://
100 /var/lib/
if I run ofono in the foreground, I see
ofonod[23701]: ril_cops_list_cb: can't allocate ofono_network_
at the point of failure.
No crash. syslog attached.
Changed in ofono (Ubuntu): | |
assignee: | nobody → Tony Espy (awe) |
@Ian
First, the expected results for this script should be an AccessDenied shown in a backtrace, as we currently only support automatic network registration, and thus scanning is forbidden.
From the error message in your description, it appears ofono can't allocate memory for an instance of an ofono_network_ operator struct. As there hasn't been a release of ofono in the past week, I'm suspecting this was caused by some other process. Also, there were quite a few failures reported by QA for build #160, thus it was never promoted.
I have not been able to reproduce the problem with build #161 ( which is the latest to be promoted ), nor has Oliver Grawert.
1. Did you install any custom packages?
2. What were you doing before the problem occurred ( ie. playing videos, some kind of testing, ... )?
3. Can you reliably reproduce the problem on image #161 ( which was promoted ) or greater?
4. If you can't reproduce it on #161 and want dig deeper into the problem on #160, further questions
5. Can you reliably reproduce the problem on #160??
6. Does it go away when you reboot?
Also, if you get it into this condition again, it'd be very helpful to try and grab some memory utilization #s. The "free" command and/or the contents of /proc/meminfo would both be helpful. If you want to get more detailed in order to determine the memory hog, you could also install "smem" and run the command "smem -s uss".
1. Can you easily reproduce this on image #160? What happens if you reboot? Can you still make it happen?
If the answer is yes, can you