Please sync qca 2.0.0~beta7 from Debian experimental (+more tasks)

Bug #128505 reported by Maia Everett
4
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
mailody (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned
psi (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned
qca (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned
qca2 (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

The QCA library (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qca) is currently used by:

- psi
- mailody

The problem that will arise with the sync is: QCA1 is a Qt3 library used by Qt3 applications; QCA2 is a Qt4 library used by Qt4 applications. Both, however, are managed in Debian as the same source package (qca; http://packages.qa.debian.org/q/qca.html) and their binaries are conflicting (libqca.so). QCA1 programs cannot be easily ported to QCA2.

While the Debian source package for QCA2 is qca, the Ubuntu source package qca2 (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qca2) has spent quite some time in NEW - since July 9 - and is now outdated. It should probably be nuked.

Psi version 0.11 RC2 uses Qt4 and requires QCA2 version 2.0.0 beta7 - the version currently in Debian experimental. So we can sync that and package Psi. (Bug #120315 is dedicated to packaging Psi 0.11).

Mailody is a more complicated case, there is no public Qt4/QCA2 release yet, although porting efforts are underway. I will inquire toma about their status.

For now, as a temporary solution until the Qt4 versions are accepted into Ubuntu, we can do the following:

1. Move source package qca to another name (changing the library name correspondingly).
2. Rebuild current versions of psi and mailody against the new package.
3. Sync qca_2.0.0~beta7 from Debian.
4. Upgrade psi from 0.10 to 0.11~rc2 (bug #120315).

Debdiffs to follow.

Revision history for this message
Maia Everett (linneris) wrote :

Debdiff #1 changes the qca 1.0 package. The renames are as follows:

- Source package: qca -> qca-qt3
- Binary package: libqca1c2 -> libqca-qt3
- Binary package: qca-dev -> libqca-qt3-dev
- Shared library: libqca.so* -> libqca-qt3.so*

The orig.tar.gz will have to be renamed to qca-qt3_1.0.orig.tar.gz.

Revision history for this message
Maia Everett (linneris) wrote :

Debdiff #2 fixes psi to link against -lqca-qt3 instead of -lqca.

Revision history for this message
Maia Everett (linneris) wrote :

Debdiff #3 fixes mailody to link against -lqca-qt3 instead of -lqca.

Important: even though it's -2ubuntu2, the original Debian package (which is the current Debian version) is -1. The previous uploader erroneously followed -1 with -2ubuntu1.

description: updated
Maia Everett (linneris)
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Frode M. Døving (frode) wrote :

There is no usable mailody4 yet.
For various reasons the progress is slow. Don't expect any usable release until after the KDE 4.0 release.

For the record. mailody 0.5.0-2 made it into debian today. With the same fix I added to ubuntu the other day, versioned 0.5.0-2ubuntu1.

We should probably consider working with the Debian KDE Extras Team on these changes.

Revision history for this message
Tom Albers (tomalbers-deactivatedaccount) wrote :

(as maintainer of mailody) : maildody for kde4 as it is now, will not use qca2

Revision history for this message
Maia Everett (linneris) wrote :

I have just inquired the Debian maintainer for qca and psi (<email address hidden>) why he's maintaining two different libraries as the same source package.

Revision history for this message
Sarah Kowalik (hobbsee-deactivatedaccount) wrote :

Please tell us the answer, when you find out.

Obviously, doing this within Debian QT KDE extras would be smart, as they hit the same problem.

unsubscribing u-u-s, subscribing myself (as i'm not sure the solution is the best way to go)

Revision history for this message
Ana Beatriz Guerrero López (ana) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Maia Everett (linneris) wrote :

The answer was:

On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 01:44:55AM +0700, Sikon wrote:
> Can you please explain why you're maintaining two completely different
> libraries (QCA1 for Qt3 and QCA2 for Qt4) as the same source package?

Because I think we should agree on a common packaging soon, I opened a
bug on the debian bts as well:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=435185

Feel free to comment there, as well (mailto:<email address hidden>).

BTW, is mailing to <bug-number>@bugs.launchpad.net sufficient to add
comments to ubuntu bugs? I sent a Cc: of my last mail to
<email address hidden>, but it didn't yet show up on
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qca/+bug/128505, so I wonder
if I missed something.

Revision history for this message
Maia Everett (linneris) wrote :

Marked the bug as invalid. qca and qca2 are now separate packages for both Debian and Ubuntu, and Debian's qca2 2.0.0~beta7 has been added to Ubuntu.

Changed in qca:
status: New → Invalid
Changed in qca2:
status: New → Invalid
Changed in psi:
status: New → Invalid
Changed in mailody:
status: New → Invalid
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.