dwww: use Strigi instead of swish?
Bug #129619 reported by
Loye Young
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| dwww (Ubuntu) |
Expired
|
Wishlist
|
Unassigned | ||
Bug Description
Binary package hint: dwww
Is it possible for dwww to depend on strigi for its indexing, instead of swish++?
Swish++ does the job, but it has a large memory footprint, and consumes tons of processor speed when it's running.
Strigi, which is to be installed by default on Kubuntu, may be a better alternative.
Revision history for this message
| Jeff Anderson (jander99) wrote | #1 |
| Changed in dwww (Ubuntu): | |
| status: | New → Incomplete |
| Changed in dwww (Ubuntu): | |
| importance: | Undecided → Wishlist |
| status: | Incomplete → New |
| summary: |
- dwww: use Strigi instead of swish? (wishlist) + dwww: use Strigi instead of swish? |
| Changed in dwww (Ubuntu): | |
| status: | New → Incomplete |
Revision history for this message
| Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote | #2 |
| Changed in dwww (Ubuntu): | |
| status: | Incomplete → Expired |
To post a comment you must log in.
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been any activity in it recently. We were wondering if this is still an issue for you. Can you try with the latest Ubuntu release? Thanks in advance.