Inconsistency in multi-unit parts
Bug #1369153 reported by
Richard
This bug affects 1 person
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KiCad |
Fix Released
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
Bug Description
This isn't important, but I imagine it is simple to fix. When making a multi-unit part in the library editor, the different units are referred to as letters (unit A, B C...); wheras in eeschema they are referred to as numbers (unit 1, 2, 3...). Surely these should both be the same?
I would suggest making both referred to as letters because this is the convention with multiple-unit parts.
Revision history for this message
| Lorenzo Marcantonio (l-marcantonio) wrote Re: [Bug 1369153] [NEW] Inconsistency in multi-unit parts | #1 |
Revision history for this message
| Wayne Stambaugh (stambaughw) wrote | #2 |
| Changed in kicad: | |
| status: | New → Fix Committed |
| Changed in kicad: | |
| status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
To post a comment you must log in.
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 08:01:41PM -0000, Richard wrote:
> This isn't important, but I imagine it is simple to fix. When making a
> multi-unit part in the library editor, the different units are referred
> to as letters (unit A, B C...); wheras in eeschema they are referred to
> as numbers (unit 1, 2, 3...). Surely these should both be the same?
There is an eeschema option for the style of the unit subdesignator.
However you are right, it isn't handled in the library editor, only in
the schematic.
--
Lorenzo Marcantonio
Logos Srl