[RV350 9600] 6.7.192 resolution not correctly detected

Bug #137626 reported by Nicolò Chieffo
4
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
X.Org X server
Fix Released
Medium
xserver-xorg-video-ati (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-ati

testing ati driver for gutsy
6.7.192-1ubuntu1

I have a laptop with an lcd screen of 15"
the native resolution is 1400x1050 it is correctly detected, but see the list
of resolutions:
1400x1050 60.2*+
  1280x800 60.0
  1280x768 60.0
1024x768 60.0
800x600 60.3
640x480 59.9

1280x800 & 1280x768 should not be there, sine they are not for 4:3 screens and
should be substituted by 1280x1024 (I think)

Revision history for this message
Nicolò Chieffo (yelo3) wrote : 6.7.192 resolution not correctly detected

Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-ati

testing ati driver for gutsy
6.7.192-1ubuntu1

I have a laptop with an lcd screen of 15"
the native resolution is 1400x1050 it is correctly detected, but see the list
of resolutions:
1400x1050 60.2*+
  1280x800 60.0
  1280x768 60.0
1024x768 60.0
800x600 60.3
640x480 59.9

1280x800 & 1280x768 should not be there, sine they are not for 4:3 screens and
should be substituted by 1280x1024 (I think)

Changed in xorg-server:
status: Unknown → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
In , Nicolò Chieffo (yelo3) wrote :

Created an attachment (id=11488)
Xorg.0.log

Revision history for this message
Tormod Volden (tormodvolden) wrote : Re: 6.7.192 resolution not correctly detected

Can you please attach Xorg.0.log, either here or in the upstream bug?

Revision history for this message
Nicolò Chieffo (yelo3) wrote :

Sure, here you are. I will attach it upstream too

Revision history for this message
In , agd5f (agd5f) wrote :

can you post your config as well?

Revision history for this message
In , Nicolò Chieffo (yelo3) wrote :

Well, I only changed

Option "GartSize" "64"
Option "XaaNoOffscreenPixmaps" "true"

and

Virtual 1400 1050

Revision history for this message
In , agd5f (agd5f) wrote :

(In reply to comment #3)
> Well, I only changed
>
> Option "GartSize" "64"
> Option "XaaNoOffscreenPixmaps" "true"
>
> and
>
> Virtual 1400 1050
>

Changed from what? You haven't attached your config. Anyway, it looks like what's going on is that the server is attempting to add the various server modes, many of which (including the 1280x1024 modes) are being rejected for various reasons. The 1280x800 and 1280x768 modes are being validated and allowed. This isn't really a problem a per se as any mode other than 1400x1050 will use the panel scaler.

Revision history for this message
In , Nicolò Chieffo (yelo3) wrote :

Changed in the sense that there were no additional options in the section Device. I don't have here my notebook so I cannot attach xorg.conf

I didn't understand why 1280x1024 is rejected and 1280xother not, since they are not "native" for 15" 4:3 panels.

PS: I need to use 1280x1024 when I attach the external screen since the maximum resolution of the screen is 1280x1024. and if I keep my panel to 1400x1050 the image in the external screen is truncated at the bottom and right (because it has a smaller resolution)

Revision history for this message
In , agd5f (agd5f) wrote :

(In reply to comment #5)
> Changed in the sense that there were no additional options in the section
> Device. I don't have here my notebook so I cannot attach xorg.conf
>
> I didn't understand why 1280x1024 is rejected and 1280xother not, since they
> are not "native" for 15" 4:3 panels.

the only mode that is "native" is 1400x1050. Everything else is scaled. it makes no difference to hw. besides you might want to match your modes to another output device (beamer on a VGA port for example) that supports that mode. The log says why the 1280x1024 modes were rejected:
(II) RADEON(0): Not using default mode "1280x1024" (hsync out of range)
(II) RADEON(0): Not using default mode "1280x1024" (vrefresh out of range)
(II) RADEON(0): Not using default mode "1280x1024" (vrefresh out of range)

>
> PS: I need to use 1280x1024 when I attach the external screen since the maximum
> resolution of the screen is 1280x1024. and if I keep my panel to 1400x1050 the
> image in the external screen is truncated at the bottom and right (because it
> has a smaller resolution)
>

you can add 1280x1024 to the modes line in your screen config or add the mode at runtime using xrandr
xrandr --addmode LVDS 1280x1024

Changed in xserver-xorg-video-ati:
status: New → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Nicolò Chieffo (yelo3) wrote : Re: [Bug 137626] Re: 6.7.192 resolution not correctly detected

which other information do you need?

Revision history for this message
Tormod Volden (tormodvolden) wrote : Re: 6.7.192 resolution not correctly detected

Some conclusion from upstream :) Actually, I don't know, but we have been told by the bug squad to take the bug out of "New" as soon as it has been looked at and commented to. I guess it should at some point be confirmed as a bug, or closed as an invalid one. Upstream doesn't really think it is a bug, from what I can see.

Revision history for this message
Tormod Volden (tormodvolden) wrote :

BTW, you can find a newer version at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/XorgOnTheEdge
Please tell if there's any difference.

Revision history for this message
Nicolò Chieffo (yelo3) wrote : Re: [Bug 137626] Re: 6.7.192 resolution not correctly detected

still present in 6.7.194

I really don't understand why upstream thinks this is not a bug...
Have you understood?
If the resolution does not match with my panel size it must not be added!

Revision history for this message
Tormod Volden (tormodvolden) wrote : Re: 6.7.192 resolution not correctly detected

Well, xrandr lists all possible modes, whether they make for a stretched picture or not. This is actually useful, in case you want to clone it to an external, different screen.

Revision history for this message
Nicolò Chieffo (yelo3) wrote : Re: [Bug 137626] Re: 6.7.192 resolution not correctly detected

ok, now I understood, but I still not understand why X thinks that
1280x1024 is a wrong resolution:

(II) RADEON(0): Not using default mode "1280x1024" (hsync out of range)
(II) RADEON(0): Not using default mode "1280x1024" (vrefresh out of range)

Revision history for this message
Tormod Volden (tormodvolden) wrote : Re: 6.7.192 resolution not correctly detected

I don't see the detected hsync/vrefresh ranges in your log, but apparently they exclude the 1280x1024 modes. Please attach your xorg.conf, and try also without one. Is this with the "-tv2" ati driver?

Revision history for this message
Nicolò Chieffo (yelo3) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Nicolò Chieffo (yelo3) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Nicolò Chieffo (yelo3) wrote :

this is the ati version: 6.7.194-1ubuntu1tv2
I will try without xorg.conf on monday, now I can't.

Revision history for this message
Tormod Volden (tormodvolden) wrote :

(Don't bother to remove old attached files, they can always prove handy for comparisons)

I am wondering a little about the HOverplus value in your log, mine for instance is 24.

(WW) RADEON(0): LVDS Info:
XRes: 1400, YRes: 1050, DotClock: 108000
HBlank: 288, HOverPlus: 32808, HSyncWidth: 112
VBlank: 13, VOverPlus: 2, VSyncWidth: 3

Revision history for this message
Nicolò Chieffo (yelo3) wrote : Re: [Bug 137626] Re: 6.7.192 resolution not correctly detected

well, I don't know what it is. Can this value be viewed in windows xp,
so we can do a comparison?

Revision history for this message
Tormod Volden (tormodvolden) wrote : Re: 6.7.192 resolution not correctly detected

Can you attach the log from using the attached package? It includes a bit more LVDS info.

Revision history for this message
In , Bugzi09-fdo-tormod (bugzi09-fdo-tormod) wrote :

Looking at the log in the original bug report in https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137626 I can see some strange HOverPlus value of 32808. Is it wrong in the BIOS or is it decoded wrongly by the driver? Can this exclude otherwise acceptable modes?

Revision history for this message
Nicolò Chieffo (yelo3) wrote : Re: 6.7.192 resolution not correctly detected
Revision history for this message
mabovo (mabovo) wrote :

In my newbee opinion, LCD monitors have their own screen resolution so gutsy sometimes shows out of the square mainly the scrolling bar on firefox is dificult to point with the mouse. I always have to proceed with auto adjustment for colors, brightness and screen position.
I wonder if this is not one of the reasons that radeon cards (RV350 mine) sometimes scrambled the screen or display a black screen.

Revision history for this message
mabovo (mabovo) wrote :

I mean in some parts of the Xorg.0.log file xorg.conf defines Radeon display dimensions as (380, 300) mm but there are different size in other parts.
Ex. (**) RADEON(0): Display dimensions: (380, 300) mm
      (II) RADEON(0): Setting screen physical size to 376 x 301
      (II) RADEON(0): clock: 108.0 MHz Image Size: 376 x 301 mm

Revision history for this message
Tormod Volden (tormodvolden) wrote :

Yes, "Setting screen physical size" sounds like the best hack ever :) This small deviation shouldn't cause any problems though.

Changed in xserver-xorg-video-ati:
status: Incomplete → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
In , agd5f (agd5f) wrote :

Can you try again with ati 6.7.19x or ati git master?

Revision history for this message
In , Nicolò Chieffo (yelo3) wrote :

I'm using 6.7.195 and I'm on ubuntu gutsy. I don't know if there are updated packages... I will try to update to the pre-alpha version of ubuntu to see if it helps

Changed in xorg-server:
status: Confirmed → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Tormod Volden (tormodvolden) wrote : Re: 6.7.192 resolution not correctly detected

Please find 6.7.196 packages for Gutsy on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/XorgOnTheEdge

Revision history for this message
In , Benjamin-close (benjamin-close) wrote :

Bugzilla Upgrade Mass Bug Change

NEEDSINFO state was removed in Bugzilla 3.x, reopening any bugs previously listed as NEEDSINFO.

  - benjsc
    fd.o Wrangler

Changed in xorg-server:
status: Incomplete → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Tormod Volden (tormodvolden) wrote : Re: 6.7.192 resolution not correctly detected

Nicolo, can you please try Hardy Alpha 3? And upgrade to the newest -ati driver from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/XorgOnTheEdge (it has both Gutsy and Hardy packages).

Changed in xserver-xorg-video-ati:
assignee: nobody → tormodvolden
status: Confirmed → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Nicolò Chieffo (yelo3) wrote : Re: [Bug 137626] Re: 6.7.192 resolution not correctly detected

the same with 1:6.8.0-1

Changed in xserver-xorg-video-ati:
assignee: tormodvolden → nobody
status: Incomplete → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Brian Murray (brian-murray) wrote : Ubuntu needs you!

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. In the development cycle for Intrepid there have been some vast improvements in the open source ati video driver and we could use your help testing them. Could you please download the latest Alpha CD image of Intrepid and test this particular bug just using the Live CD? You can find the latest image at http://www.ubuntu.com/testing . Your testing can help make Ubuntu and the open source ati driver even better! Thanks in advance.

Changed in xserver-xorg-video-ati:
status: Confirmed → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Nicolò Chieffo (yelo3) wrote : Re: 6.7.192 resolution not correctly detected

Sorry, not now. Next month!

Bryce Harrington (bryce)
Changed in xserver-xorg-video-ati:
status: Incomplete → New
status: New → Incomplete
Bryce Harrington (bryce)
Changed in xserver-xorg-video-ati:
status: Incomplete → Triaged
Revision history for this message
Nicolò Chieffo (yelo3) wrote : Re: [Bug 137626] Re: 6.7.192 resolution not correctly detected

I don't have an ati card any more. Now I have an intel, and a widescreen.
The resolutions offered are 1280x800 (which is native) and 1024x768,
800x600 and 640x480
maybe this is not a problem because 4:3 resolutions can be viewed in
16:10 screens too

Revision history for this message
In , agd5f (agd5f) wrote :

is this still an issue with a newer xserver/driver?

Revision history for this message
In , Nicolò Chieffo (yelo3) wrote :

I don't have anymore that monitor.

Bryce Harrington (bryce)
tags: added: resolution
Revision history for this message
Nicolò Chieffo (yelo3) wrote : Re: [Bug 137626] Re: [RV350 9600] 6.7.192 resolution not correctly detected

I think this bug should be closed, since showing also non-native
resolutions could be a wanted behavior

Revision history for this message
In , Glisse (glisse) wrote :

Closing this bug as it can't be confirmed anymore.

Changed in xorg-server:
status: Confirmed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Bryce Harrington (bryce) wrote :

Thanks, agreed; closing.

Changed in xserver-xorg-video-ati (Ubuntu):
status: Triaged → Invalid
Changed in xorg-server:
importance: Unknown → Medium
Changed in xorg-server:
importance: Medium → Unknown
Changed in xorg-server:
importance: Unknown → Medium
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.