Z39.50 Servers Attributes page missing

Basically, we want to be able to filter the existing auto-generated Z39.50 Attributes page so that it shows only the attributes for a specific Z39.50 source. If we had that, then each entry on Z39.50 Sources could just have a link to an appropriately-filtered Z39.50 Attributes page.

Note that bug 1840385 is basically the same problem. It would be great if they could share a common solution, like a generic Angular component that filters a list of attributes on some specified foreign-key value (router path ':schema/:table/:filter-on/:value'). Maybe this capability can even be added to the existing BasicAdminPageComponent?

Bill pointed out that the existing z3950_attr UI can accept a gridFilters param containing a JSON-encoded filter, like so:

/eg2/en-US/staff/admin/server/config/z3950_attr?gridFilters={"source":"oclc"}

This will show the attributes for the "oclc" source only. So it should just be a question of adding links to the Z39.50 Sources grid that use gridFilters with the source's text code. I haven't figured out how to do that so far.

Seconding that this is a significant bug, because as far as I can tell, this means you cannot add a new target or edit any of your attributes for an existing target. Super frustrating!

Quick clarification. You can create a new target; you just can't set it up with any attributes. So effectively you cannot create a usable target.

I've opened bug 1847800 for adding links between admin pages, since that feature is needed to resolve several different bugs in addition to this one.

Just noting that the Z39.50 Attributes page is also where you are able to set credentials for the target. I don't think this warrants a separate ticket, but wanted to note it is functionality that should be restored.

http://docs.evergreen-ils.org/reorg/3.2/staff_client_admin/_storing_z39_50_server_credentials.html

confirming this is still an issue in 3.5

I'm seeing the attributes configuration in 3.5, thanks to bug 1847800 (which was merged a month after your comment, Jennifer). So I am marking this as a duplicate of 1847800.