Ubuntu
ibm-java71 package

[Comm] IBM JDK 8.0.6.5 integration into Ubuntu

Bug #1861984 reported by bugproxy
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Ubuntu on IBM z Systems
Fix Released
High
Skipper Bug Screeners
ibm-java71 (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Undecided
Ubuntu Package Archive Administrators

Bug Description

~/sandbox/binary$ ftp archive.admin.canonical.com
Connected to archive.admin.canonical.com.
220 youngberry.canonical.com FTP server (Poppy Upload Server) ready.
Name (archive.admin.canonical.com:foreman): anonymous
331 Password required
Password:
230 Login Successful.
Remote system type is UNIX.
Using binary mode to transfer files.
ftp> bin
200 Type set to Binary.
ftp> prompt off
Interactive mode off.
ftp> put 80sr6fp5_20200111_02_ocdc.tar.gz
local: 80sr6fp5_20200111_02_ocdc.tar.gz remote: 80sr6fp5_20200111_02_ocdc.tar.gz
200 PORT command successful.
150 Opening Binary connection for /80sr6fp5_20200111_02_ocdc.tar.gz
226 Transfer successful.
658783435 bytes sent in 122.72 secs (5242.6 kB/s)

Status of providing SNAPS:
We were not able to create SNAPS for this release due to other priorities.
We will try to generate Package in SNAPS for next release.
Thanks !!!

bugproxy (bugproxy)
tags: added: architecture-s39064 bugnameltc-183620 severity-high targetmilestone-inin---
Changed in ubuntu:
assignee: nobody → Skipper Bug Screeners (skipper-screen-team)
affects: ubuntu → linux (Ubuntu)
Heinz-Werner Seeck (heinz-werner-seeck)
affects: linux (Ubuntu) → ibm-java71 (Ubuntu)
Frank Heimes (fheimes)
Changed in ubuntu-z-systems:
status: New → Triaged
importance: Undecided → High
assignee: nobody → Skipper Bug Screeners (skipper-screen-team)
Revision history for this message
Frank Heimes (fheimes) wrote :

I create RT 124094 to retrieve the uploaded file.

Changed in ubuntu-z-systems:
status: Triaged → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Frank Heimes (fheimes) wrote :

@IBM: Did you considered moving the IBM Java packages in future to snaps?
Last time we provided some introductory level information (and tutorials) to get used to snaps.
But we are happy to help out further and assist you.
Please notice that building and distributing snaps is simpler, once it's setup.
And that snaps are largely platform independent, hence you can reach a much broader audience with snaps compared to the debs in the partner archive.

Revision history for this message
bugproxy (bugproxy) wrote : Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

------- Comment From <email address hidden> 2020-02-05 04:34 EDT-------
(In reply to comment #9)
> @IBM: Did you considered moving the IBM Java packages in future to snaps?
> Last time we provided some introductory level information (and tutorials) to
> get used to snaps.
> But we are happy to help out further and assist you.
> Please notice that building and distributing snaps is simpler, once it's
> setup.
> And that snaps are largely platform independent, hence you can reach a much
> broader audience with snaps compared to the debs in the partner archive.

We did try creating the packages using the tutorial, but were not successful yet. Will resume the work on this and get back incase of any clarifications required. Thanks !!

Revision history for this message
Frank Heimes (fheimes) wrote :

File got retrieved successfully .

Changed in ibm-java71 (Ubuntu):
assignee: Skipper Bug Screeners (skipper-screen-team) → dann frazier (dannf)
Changed in ubuntu-z-systems:
status: Incomplete → Triaged
dann frazier (dannf)
Changed in ibm-java71 (Ubuntu):
status: New → In Progress
Revision history for this message
dann frazier (dannf) wrote :

Uploaded to xenial-proposed. btw, should we now request copying to focal?

Changed in ibm-java71 (Ubuntu):
assignee: dann frazier (dannf) → Ubuntu Package Archive Administrators (ubuntu-archive)
Revision history for this message
Steve Langasek (vorlon) wrote :

this seems to have wound up in the Ubuntu xenial-proposed queue, rather than the partner queue, by mistake.

Revision history for this message
Frank Heimes (fheimes) wrote :

@dannf: Yes, I think once quickly tested (as usual) we should do the final copy to all LTSes with s390x support - so not only, xenial and bionic, but also focal - I agree.

Revision history for this message
dann frazier (dannf) wrote :

Now uploaded to the correct queue.

Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Accepted into partner xenial-proposed.

Frank Heimes (fheimes)
Changed in ibm-java71 (Ubuntu):
status: In Progress → Fix Committed
Changed in ubuntu-z-systems:
status: Triaged → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Frank Heimes (fheimes) wrote :

I ran the usual quick test on the packages ibm-java80-jre and ibm-java80-jdk (both from "-proposed partner" on xenial in version 8.0.6.5) performing install, upgrade, package info, version, help, compile, verbose compile and program execution.
So far everything looks and works like expected. So 'Ubuntu Package Archive Administrators' please copy the packages over to xenial _and_ bionic partner release pocket and if already possible also to the focal partner release pocket - thanks!

Revision history for this message
Steve Langasek (vorlon) wrote :

ibm-java80 8.0.6.5-0ubuntu1 has been published now to xenial and bionic.

Changed in ibm-java71 (Ubuntu):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Frank Heimes (fheimes) wrote :

Thx, jre and jdk landed in xenial partner release pocket and bionic partner release pocket.

Changed in ubuntu-z-systems:
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
bugproxy (bugproxy)
tags: added: targetmilestone-inin2004
removed: targetmilestone-inin---
Revision history for this message
bugproxy (bugproxy) wrote :

------- Comment From <email address hidden> 2020-03-02 10:31 EDT-------
IBM Bugzilla status-> closed, Fix Released by Canonical

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.
Subscribing...

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.