Untranslatable strings in grub menu

Bug #1874125 reported by Igor Zubarev
22
This bug affects 2 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
memtest86+ (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Low
Unassigned
Focal
Confirmed
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

* Impact
The memory test grub items are not translatable

* Test case
The translatable strings should be listed on launchpad so they can be included in the next language packs exports
https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memtest86+

* Regression potential
There is no actual change but launchpad enforce an source upload for the initial import of a template (and it didn't happen because the sharing setting was wrongly set, which is fixed now)

----------

Currently grub menu contains strings which still untranslated:
"Memory test"
"recovery mode"

I searched them in launchpad grub translation and didn't found. After that I searched in Ubuntu 20.04 Beta disc. See my results for Ubuntu Beta:

$ grep -Ril "Memory test" /mnt/cdrom
/mnt/cdrom/isolinux/bootlogo
/mnt/cdrom/isolinux/en.hlp
/mnt/cdrom/isolinux/f3.txt
grep: предупреждение: /mnt/cdrom/ubuntu: каталоги рекурсивно зациклены

igor@igor-SVF15A1S9RB:~$ grep -Ril "recovery mode" /mnt/cdrom
/mnt/cdrom/casper/initrd
/mnt/cdrom/casper/initrd-oem

Yuri Chornoivan also make some investigation:
1. "Memory test" is from Debian patch to memtest86+ package

http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/m/memtest86+/
memtest86+_5.01-3.1ubuntu1.debian.tar.xz

Can be translated via Debian bug reporting system, but got lost somehow.

2. "recovery mode" is from Ubuntu patch to grub2

http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/g/grub2/
grub2_2.04-1ubuntu26.debian.tar.xz

It's in /debian/patches/mkconfig-recovery-title.patch

Bug report:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1240360

Patch:

https://nest.parrot.sh/packages/debian/grub2/blob/
0008378d0c2d957b8ff941a44ad74ad4f617266c/debian/patches/mkconfig-recovery-
title.patch

As you can see (line 48), it is not extractable and not translatable.

affects: grub (Ubuntu) → memtest86+ (Ubuntu)
Changed in memtest86+ (Ubuntu):
importance: Undecided → Low
status: New → In Progress
Revision history for this message
Igor Zubarev (igor.zubarev) wrote :

Sebasian, I also found that all strings in grub recovery menu are untranslated at all, but before they were translated. See attach

Also there are a lot of artifacts. It seems it is bug too.

Revision history for this message
Igor Zubarev (igor.zubarev) wrote :

See how it was in 16.04

Revision history for this message
Yuri Chornoivan (yurchor-gmail) wrote :

@igor.zubarev Please report recovery bugs against the "friendly-recovery" package separately.

Revision history for this message
Igor Zubarev (igor.zubarev) wrote :

Yuri, done. I create a bug about friendly-recovery.
See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/friendly-recovery/+bug/1874274

Revision history for this message
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

The grub issue, I've tried to add a line
'gettext "recovery mode" to utils/grub-mkconfig.in
but for some reason that's not picked up/listed in the template after a build

description: updated
Revision history for this message
Brian Murray (brian-murray) wrote : Please test proposed package

Hello Igor, or anyone else affected,

Accepted memtest86+ into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memtest86+/5.01-3.1ubuntu2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in memtest86+ (Ubuntu Focal):
status: New → Fix Committed
tags: added: verification-needed verification-needed-focal
Revision history for this message
Igor Zubarev (igor.zubarev) wrote :

Hello, Brian! I already installed new memtest86+ from focal-proposed.

It seems translations haven't extracted to launchpad yet: "No translatable templates available
". See https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memtest86+
Also it recommends using https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+source/memtest86+/+translations which is empty too

Which of them should I use when translation will arrive?

Revision history for this message
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

Indeed, launchpad did seem to have picked up the translations...

Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package memtest86+ - 5.01-3.1ubuntu3

---------------
memtest86+ (5.01-3.1ubuntu3) groovy; urgency=medium

  * Nochange rebuild so launchpad can import the translations

 -- Sebastien Bacher <email address hidden> Wed, 10 Jun 2020 18:06:03 +0200

Changed in memtest86+ (Ubuntu):
status: In Progress → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

Launchpad is not picking up the template for some reason, which is reported as launchpad issue now

https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1883076

setting the SRU verification as failed, @SRUteam it can be delete from proposed

tags: added: verification-failed verification-failed-focal
removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal
Changed in memtest86+ (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Fix Committed → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

This is a no-change rebuild so I am not considering this verification-failed as an issue with releasing the other changes.

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.