Missing code linter support for python3.8 language features

Bug #1883175 reported by Ted Kern
20
This bug affects 2 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
pycodestyle (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Low
Ted Kern
Focal
Fix Committed
Low
Unassigned
pyflakes (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Low
Ted Kern
Focal
Fix Committed
Low
Unassigned
python-flake8 (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Low
Ted Kern
Focal
Won't Fix
Low
Unassigned

Bug Description

[Impact]

Python 3.8 language features include some syntax that python3-flake8 3.7.9-2 registers as an error.

flake8 3.8.x is now available, released after Focal. The minor version of flake8 matches the supported python version, so a release from the 3.8.x series should be ported to Focal.

This version bump requires dependency pycodestyle >= 2.6.0, which is where the bugfix occurs. The dependency pyflakes must also be updated.

[Test Case]

Create a file test.py
Use python3 language features, e.g.
```
while (a := float(input())) < 10 :
    print(f'{a=} is too much!')
print(f'{a=} works fine')
```
Run `python3 -m flake8 test.py`

Result:
"pyflakes" failed during execution due to "'FlakesChecker' object has no attribute 'NAMEDEXPR'"
Run flake8 with greater verbosity to see more details
test.py:1:9: E203 whitespace before ':'
test.py:1:10: E231 missing whitespace after ':'

`echo $?` shows a return value of 1

With the 3.8.3-1 version of the package proposed for Groovy (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-flake8/3.8.3-1) `test.py` produces no output and returns 0

[Regression Potential]

Potential is minimal as this is a minor version bump, which upstream defines as only offering additional, optional checks and not breaking backward compatibility. No reported breakages between 3.7.9 and 3.8.3 are shown in upstream issue tracker.

Any regressions would appear as unexpected errors emitted when running the linter on previously error-less, valid python code.

Upstream QA: https://flake8.pycqa.org/en/latest/internal/releases.html#process outlines the required tests a release must pass, all of which completed in https://gitlab.com/pycqa/flake8/-/pipelines/154124695

Ted Kern (arnatious)
description: updated
Ted Kern (arnatious)
description: updated
Ted Kern (arnatious)
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot (crichton) wrote :

The attachment "python-flake8_3.8.3-1.debdiff" seems to be a debdiff. The ubuntu-sponsors team has been subscribed to the bug report so that they can review and hopefully sponsor the debdiff. If the attachment isn't a patch, please remove the "patch" flag from the attachment, remove the "patch" tag, and if you are member of the ~ubuntu-sponsors, unsubscribe the team.

[This is an automated message performed by a Launchpad user owned by ~brian-murray, for any issue please contact him.]

tags: added: patch
Mathew Hodson (mhodson)
tags: added: upgrade-software-version
Changed in pycodestyle (Ubuntu):
importance: Undecided → Low
Changed in pyflakes (Ubuntu):
importance: Undecided → Low
Changed in python-flake8 (Ubuntu):
importance: Undecided → Low
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

Changed in pycodestyle (Ubuntu):
status: New → Confirmed
Changed in pyflakes (Ubuntu):
status: New → Confirmed
Changed in python-flake8 (Ubuntu):
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Matthias Klose (doko) wrote :

Sure, we can at least try to do that. pyflakes will trigger a lot of packages depending on pyflakes, so I think we get enough test coverage before we accept this package into -updates. Please make this bug report a proper SRU, and upload to package.

Ted Kern (arnatious)
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) wrote :

While full-version updates aren't usually appropriate for an SRU, I believe in this case it is the right approach.

ACK on the debdiffs in comments 3 to 5. I've uploaded them for processing by the SRU team once the packages have migrated from groovy-proposed into groovy.

Thanks!

Changed in pycodestyle (Ubuntu):
status: Confirmed → In Progress
Changed in pyflakes (Ubuntu):
status: Confirmed → In Progress
Changed in python-flake8 (Ubuntu):
status: Confirmed → In Progress
Revision history for this message
Brian Murray (brian-murray) wrote :

I'm setting this to Incomplete as the packages have *not* migrated out of groovy-proposed yet.

Changed in pycodestyle (Ubuntu Focal):
status: New → Incomplete
Changed in python-flake8 (Ubuntu Focal):
status: New → Incomplete
Changed in pyflakes (Ubuntu Focal):
status: New → Incomplete
Mathew Hodson (mhodson)
Changed in pycodestyle (Ubuntu Focal):
importance: Undecided → Low
Changed in pyflakes (Ubuntu Focal):
importance: Undecided → Low
Changed in python-flake8 (Ubuntu Focal):
importance: Undecided → Low
Revision history for this message
Chris Halse Rogers (raof) wrote : Please test proposed package

Hello Ted, or anyone else affected,

Accepted pyflakes into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pyflakes/2.2.0-1~20.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in pyflakes (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Incomplete → Fix Committed
tags: added: verification-needed verification-needed-focal
Revision history for this message
Chris Halse Rogers (raof) wrote :

Hello Ted, or anyone else affected,

Accepted pycodestyle into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pycodestyle/2.6.0-1~20.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in pycodestyle (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Incomplete → Fix Committed
Changed in python-flake8 (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Incomplete → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Chris Halse Rogers (raof) wrote :

Hello Ted, or anyone else affected,

Accepted python-flake8 into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-flake8/3.8.3-1~20.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in pycodestyle (Ubuntu):
status: In Progress → Fix Released
Changed in pyflakes (Ubuntu):
status: In Progress → Fix Released
Changed in python-flake8 (Ubuntu):
status: In Progress → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Chris Halse Rogers (raof) wrote : Re: missing support for python3.8 language features

Packages have all made it into groovy-release, marking those tasks as done and accepting the backports.

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (pycodestyle/2.6.0-1~20.04.1)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted pycodestyle (2.6.0-1~20.04.1) for focal have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

ubuntu-release-upgrader/1:20.04.23 (s390x, arm64, armhf, ppc64el, amd64)
budgie-extras/1.0.2-0ubuntu1 (i386, s390x, arm64, armhf, ppc64el, amd64)
update-manager/1:20.04.10.1 (s390x, arm64, armhf, ppc64el, amd64)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/focal/update_excuses.html#pycodestyle

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (pyflakes/2.2.0-1~20.04.1)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted pyflakes (2.2.0-1~20.04.1) for focal have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

python-b2sdk/1.0.2-1 (armhf)
mu-editor/1.0.2+dfsg-4build1 (amd64)
update-manager/1:20.04.10.1 (armhf)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/focal/update_excuses.html#pyflakes

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (python-flake8/3.8.3-1~20.04.1)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted python-flake8 (3.8.3-1~20.04.1) for focal have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

elpy/1.32.0-2 (amd64)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/focal/update_excuses.html#python-flake8

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Chris Halse Rogers (raof) wrote : Re: missing support for python3.8 language features

Just to be clear: Ted and/or Marc, we need the autopkgtests fixed before accepting this into -updates. Could we please get a plan to do that? If we don't have a plan in a week or so (it doesn't need to be *done*, it just needs to be committed to) we'll need to remove these from -proposed to ensure that we don't accidentally block other updates.

Revision history for this message
Chris Halse Rogers (raof) wrote :

I've talked with Ted; he cannot currently commit time to fixing the autopkgtest regressions, so I've removed these packages from -proposed.

Changed in pycodestyle (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Fix Committed → Confirmed
Changed in pyflakes (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Fix Committed → Confirmed
Changed in python-flake8 (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Fix Committed → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (python-flake8/3.8.3-1~20.04.1)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted python-flake8 (3.8.3-1~20.04.1) for focal have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

elpy/1.32.0-2 (amd64)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/focal/update_excuses.html#python-flake8

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (pyflakes/2.2.0-1~20.04.1)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted pyflakes (2.2.0-1~20.04.1) for focal have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

python-b2sdk/1.0.2-1 (armhf)
mu-editor/1.0.2+dfsg-4build1 (amd64)
update-manager/1:20.04.10.1 (armhf)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/focal/update_excuses.html#pyflakes

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (pycodestyle/2.6.0-1~20.04.1)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted pycodestyle (2.6.0-1~20.04.1) for focal have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

update-manager/1:20.04.10.1 (amd64, armhf, arm64, s390x, ppc64el)
budgie-extras/1.0.2-0ubuntu1 (amd64, armhf, arm64, s390x, ppc64el, i386)
ubuntu-release-upgrader/1:20.04.23 (amd64, armhf, arm64, s390x, ppc64el)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/focal/update_excuses.html#pycodestyle

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Ted Kern (arnatious)
Changed in python-flake8 (Ubuntu):
status: Fix Released → In Progress
Changed in pyflakes (Ubuntu):
status: Fix Released → In Progress
Changed in pycodestyle (Ubuntu):
status: Fix Released → In Progress
assignee: nobody → Ted Kern (arnatious)
Changed in pyflakes (Ubuntu):
assignee: nobody → Ted Kern (arnatious)
Changed in python-flake8 (Ubuntu):
assignee: nobody → Ted Kern (arnatious)
Revision history for this message
Mathew Hodson (mhodson) wrote : Re: missing support for python3.8 language features

The new packages were released in Groovy so I updated the status for those. The Focal tasks are still open because there wasn't an SRU.

Changed in python-flake8 (Ubuntu):
status: In Progress → Fix Released
Changed in pyflakes (Ubuntu):
status: In Progress → Fix Released
Changed in pycodestyle (Ubuntu):
status: In Progress → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Steve Langasek (vorlon) wrote :

python-flake8 has been copied back to focal-proposed.

Changed in python-flake8 (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Confirmed → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Steve Langasek (vorlon) wrote :

pyflakes copied back to focal-proposed.

Changed in pyflakes (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Confirmed → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Steve Langasek (vorlon) wrote :

pycodestyle copied back to focal-proposed.

Changed in pycodestyle (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Confirmed → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (pyflakes/2.2.0-1~20.04.1)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted pyflakes (2.2.0-1~20.04.1) for focal have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

python-b2sdk/1.0.2-1 (armhf)
update-manager/1:20.04.10.1 (armhf)
mu-editor/1.0.2+dfsg-4build1 (amd64)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/focal/update_excuses.html#pyflakes

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (python-flake8/3.8.3-1~20.04.1)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted python-flake8 (3.8.3-1~20.04.1) for focal have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

elpy/1.32.0-2 (amd64)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/focal/update_excuses.html#python-flake8

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (pycodestyle/2.6.0-1~20.04.1)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted pycodestyle (2.6.0-1~20.04.1) for focal have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

budgie-extras/1.0.2-0ubuntu1 (arm64, amd64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x)
update-manager/1:20.04.10.1 (arm64, amd64, armhf, ppc64el, s390x)
ubuntu-release-upgrader/1:20.04.23 (arm64, amd64, armhf, ppc64el, s390x)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/focal/update_excuses.html#pycodestyle

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Ted Kern (arnatious) wrote : Re: missing support for python3.8 language features
Revision history for this message
Ted Kern (arnatious) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Ted Kern (arnatious) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Ted Kern (arnatious) wrote :

New patches posted with correctly formatted changelog.

Failures:
budgie-extras/1.0.2-0ubuntu1 (arm64, amd64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x)
update-manager/1:20.04.10.1 (arm64, amd64, armhf, ppc64el, s390x)
ubuntu-release-upgrader/1:20.04.23 (arm64, amd64, armhf, ppc64el, s390x)

Are all related to code style errors caught by the updated linter. These are not regressions.

Failures:
python-b2sdk/1.0.2-1 (armhf)
update-manager/1:20.04.10.1 (armhf)
mu-editor/1.0.2+dfsg-4build1 (amd64)

python-b2sdk failure is due to a segfault after its test suite has completed, not related to this update
update-manager is again the same style error as above
mu-editor appears to be a timeout, likely a transient failure

Failures:
elpy/1.32.0-2 (amd64)

Are transient (timeout in profiling), a manual re-run succeeded https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/e/elpy/focal/amd64

Revision history for this message
Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) wrote :

The debdiffs in comments 31, 32, and 33 are equivalent to what is currently in focal-proposed, and do not need uploading. The changelog was fixed before the original debdiffs were uploaded.

Revision history for this message
Ted Kern (arnatious) wrote :
Mathew Hodson (mhodson)
summary: - missing support for python3.8 language features
+ Missing code linter support for python3.8 language features
Revision history for this message
Julian Andres Klode (juliank) wrote :

None of the patches were valid. They were either empty and/or against obsolete versions.

Revision history for this message
Julian Andres Klode (juliank) wrote :

Also they all had wrong version numbers in changelog and associated release information.

Revision history for this message
Julian Andres Klode (juliank) wrote :

We really should have backported the parser changes for 3.8, and not the entire pycodestyle. Tons of stuff has test suites that use pycodestyle and start failing on new versions.

Revision history for this message
Julian Andres Klode (juliank) wrote :

The autopkgtest failures only tell half the story, other packages more wisely only end up running pyflakes in pep8; and pushing out a ton of SRUs like this to users when they don't actually care about them is just annoying.

Revision history for this message
Julian Andres Klode (juliank) wrote :

Alternatively, revert the new error changes in pycodestyle/flake8 instead of patching up unrelated packages to fix breakage from the SRU and annoy users with updates they don't need.

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (pycodestyle/2.6.0-1~20.04.1)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted pycodestyle (2.6.0-1~20.04.1) for focal have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

ubuntu-release-upgrader/1:20.04.23 (amd64, armhf, s390x, arm64, ppc64el)
update-manager/1:20.04.10.1 (amd64, armhf, s390x, arm64, ppc64el)
budgie-extras/1.0.2-0ubuntu1 (amd64, armhf, i386, s390x, arm64, ppc64el)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/focal/update_excuses.html#pycodestyle

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (pyflakes/2.2.0-1~20.04.1)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted pyflakes (2.2.0-1~20.04.1) for focal have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

update-manager/1:20.04.10.1 (armhf)
python-b2sdk/1.0.2-1 (armhf)
mu-editor/1.0.2+dfsg-4build1 (amd64)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/focal/update_excuses.html#pyflakes

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Paride Legovini (paride) wrote :

Hi,

The python3-flake8 package currently in focal-proposed depends on packages which are not in focal-proposed, and is therefore uninstallable:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 python3-flake8 : Depends: python3-pycodestyle (>= 2.6.0) but it is not going to be installed
                  Depends: python3-pyflakes (>= 2.2.0) but it is not going to be installed

(Note that the missing packages are new upstream versions.)

This is preventing other packages from being built against -proposed. Specifically we hit this issue when building ubuntu-advantage-tools.

As of today python-flake8 has been in focal-proposed for 292 days -- I'm not sure if uninstallable all the time, but still. If a good version of the package isn't going to be uploaded to focal-proposed anytime soon, should perhaps python-flake8 3.8.3-1~20.04.1 be pulled from focal-proposed for the moment, unblocking the builds?

Thanks!

Paride Legovini (paride)
tags: added: verification-failed-focal
Revision history for this message
Corey Bryant (corey.bryant) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote : Proposed package removed from archive

The version of python-flake8 in the proposed pocket of Focal that was purported to fix this bug report has been removed because one or more bugs that were to be fixed by the upload have failed verification and been in this state for more than 10 days.

tags: removed: verification-needed-focal
Changed in python-flake8 (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Fix Committed → Won't Fix
tags: removed: verification-needed
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.