[MIR][jammy] oem-stella-nobisuke-rpl-meta

Bug #2016830 reported by OEM Taipei Bot
14
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
OEM Priority Project
Fix Committed
Critical
OEM Taipei Bot
Ubuntu
In Progress
Undecided
Unassigned
oem-stella-nobisuke-rpl-meta (Ubuntu)
Jammy
Fix Committed
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

[Background]

Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MIRTeam/Exceptions/OEM and https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/OEMMeta for details.

[Impact]

 1. Upgrade path: Users will be upgrading from a package in the associated OEM archive, not the Ubuntu archive.
 2. The background and impact of the situation for this change, and it's impact.

[Testing]

 1. Test that `ubuntu-drivers list-oem` lists the meta-package on the relevant hardware
 2. Test that fully installing the meta-package (upgrading to the OEM archive if relevant) works properly on the hardware
 3. Do an offline install. Boot the system. Run update-manager. Check that an upgrade to the OEM package is offered and that it completes successfully and the hardware works properly.

[Regression Potential]

Most potential regressions will live in the package set that will be installed via dependency of this package, which live in OEM archive (outside of Ubuntu) and control by OEM team. OEM team and other corresponding team need take responsibility of those dependency installed.

[When switching kernel flavour] Check that the new kernel flavour works on the target platform.

[Availability]
This is a meta package for https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MIRTeam/Exceptions/OEM that means the package doesn't exist in Debian or Ubuntu archive yet.
The source code of the oem-stella-nobisuke-rpl-meta for jammy:
    git clone -b nobisuke-rpl-jammy-ubuntu https://git.launchpad.net/~oem-solutions-engineers/pc-enablement/+git/oem-stella-projects-meta

[Rationale]
We want to improve the hardware support for some HP platforms.

[Security]
No CVE/known security issue.

[Quality assurance]
I have used ppa:oem-solutions-engineers/oem-projects-meta to check this package on some HP platforms.
oem-stella-nobisuke-rpl-meta will be upgraded to 22.04ubuntu1 or the later version from OEM archive.

[Dependencies]
It only depends on ubuntu-oem-keyring.

[Standards compliance]
This package should have met all requirements of https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MIRTeam/Exceptions/OEM.

[Maintenance]
Canonical OEM Enablement Team will take care of the maintenance.

[Background information]
Please check https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MIRTeam/Exceptions/OEM for details.

Please use "oem-metapackage-mir-check" in lp:ubuntu-archive-tools to verify this MIR against the reference package in the archive.

https://ubuntu.com/certified/202304-31494
https://ubuntu.com/certified/202304-31495

Changed in oem-priority:
assignee: nobody → OEM Taipei Bot (oem-taipei-bot)
importance: Undecided → Critical
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
OEM Taipei Bot (oem-taipei-bot) wrote :

Attach oem-stella-nobisuke-rpl-meta_22.04~ubuntu1.debdiff by oem-scripts 1.85.

description: updated
summary: - [DRAFT][MIR][jammy] oem-stella-nobisuke-rpl-meta
+ [MIR][jammy] oem-stella-nobisuke-rpl-meta
Changed in oem-priority:
status: Confirmed → In Progress
tags: added: oem-scripts-1.85
removed: oem-scripts-1.69
Cyrus Lien (cyruslien)
tags: added: certify-planning originate-from-2016378
tags: added: oem-scripts-1.88
removed: oem-scripts-1.85
Cyrus Lien (cyruslien)
description: updated
Changed in oem-priority:
status: In Progress → Fix Committed
tags: added: oem-needs-upload ubuntu-certified
Changed in ubuntu:
status: New → In Progress
tags: added: oem-done-upload oem-scripts-1.92
removed: oem-needs-upload oem-scripts-1.88
Revision history for this message
Shih-Yuan Lee (fourdollars) wrote :

I have uploaded the package into https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jammy/+queue.

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot (crichton) wrote :

The attachment "oem-stella-nobisuke-rpl-meta_22.04~ubuntu1.debdiff" seems to be a debdiff. The ubuntu-sponsors team has been subscribed to the bug report so that they can review and hopefully sponsor the debdiff. If the attachment isn't a patch, please remove the "patch" flag from the attachment, remove the "patch" tag, and if you are member of the ~ubuntu-sponsors, unsubscribe the team.

[This is an automated message performed by a Launchpad user owned by ~brian-murray, for any issue please contact him.]

tags: added: patch
Revision history for this message
Steve Langasek (vorlon) wrote :

+alias pci:*sv0000103Csd00008AC9bc0Csc05* meta oem-stella-nobisuke-rpl-meta

Same question as on LP: #1997662: what is this PCI ID and how are we supposed to know it's correct?

PCI vendor == OEM, that part is reasonable. PCI device 8AC9 is not known to /usr/share/misc/pci.ids.

Changed in ubuntu:
status: In Progress → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Cyrus Lien (cyruslien) wrote :

@Steve,

Sorry for the late reply.

The BIOS ID=SVID + SSID, SVID is Dell ID and all of the Dell platforms share the same Dell ID, SSID is subsystem ID and it is unique for every platform.

All OEM BIOS will set the SVID and SSID to the PCI device’s space: 2C-2F.

For more detail information, please refer to https://docs.google.com/document/d/1psbB8w2ztwP5YF8qZKRJUYYhKo5CvI_s_VQi-LA8zec/edit

Thanks

Revision history for this message
Steve Langasek (vorlon) wrote :

> The BIOS ID=SVID + SSID, SVID is Dell ID

I'm afraid that document only describes platform detection for Dell systems. The PCI vendor ID being matched on in the upload of this package is HP (103c), not Dell.

Revision history for this message
Cyrus Lien (cyruslien) wrote :

Yes, the document describes platform detection for Dell systems but HP systems follow it as well. BTW, only Lenovo systems match by DMI string.

Cyrus Lien (cyruslien)
Changed in oem-priority:
status: Fix Committed → In Progress
status: In Progress → Fix Committed
Changed in ubuntu:
status: Incomplete → In Progress
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote : Please test proposed package

Hello OEM, or anyone else affected,

Accepted oem-stella-nobisuke-rpl-meta into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/oem-stella-nobisuke-rpl-meta/22.04~ubuntu1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-jammy to verification-done-jammy. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-jammy. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

tags: added: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy
Changed in oem-stella-nobisuke-rpl-meta (Ubuntu Jammy):
status: New → Fix Committed
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.