firefox crashed with SIGSEGV

Bug #287798 reported by to be removed
8
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: firefox-3.0

I was testing Ubuntu intrepid i386 DVD, the current RC version. I installed flash manually, then opened firefox, and went to youtube. Instant crash. (This happened under kvm, if that matters.)

ProblemType: Crash
Architecture: i386
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/firefox-3.0.3/firefox
Package: firefox-3.0 3.0.3+nobinonly-0ubuntu2
ProcAttrCurrent: unconfined
ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/firefox-3.0.3/firefox
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games
 LANG=fi_FI.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: firefox-3.0
StacktraceTop:
 ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
 ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
 ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
 ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
 ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
Title: firefox crashed with SIGSEGV
Uname: Linux 2.6.27-7-generic i686
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare

Revision history for this message
to be removed (liw) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : Symbolic stack trace

StacktraceTop:?? ()
?? ()
?? ()
?? ()
?? ()

Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : Symbolic threaded stack trace
Revision history for this message
Alexander Sack (asac) wrote :

Hi,

unfortunately your crash report didn't yield the required information. This can eventually happen. Please go ahead and submit new crash reports in future.

Thanks for your contribution,
  - Alexander

Changed in flashplugin-nonfree:
status: New → Invalid
Revision history for this message
Daniel T Chen (crimsun) wrote :

Are we not recommending the use of the flashplugin-nonfree package/wrapper due to its dependency on nspluginwrapper?

Revision history for this message
Alexander Sack (asac) wrote :

Yes Daniel. Why?

tags: added: iso-testing
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.