epiphany does not start - complains about dbus proxy

Bug #29906 reported by Robert Collins
24
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
epiphany-browser (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Medium
Ubuntu Desktop Bugs

Bug Description

After fully updating today (28th jan) I get the following starting epiphany:
==
$epiphany

** (epiphany:5361): WARNING **: Unable to connect to session bus: Unable to determine the address of the message bus

** (epiphany:5361): WARNING **: Unable to connect to system bus: Failed to connect to socket /var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket: No such file or directory

** (epiphany:5361): WARNING **: Unable to get proxy for DBus's s bus.

** (epiphany:5361): WARNING **: Unable to get DBus proxy; aborting activation.
====

ii epiphany-browser 1.9.5.1-0ubuntu3 Intuitive GNOME web browser

Revision history for this message
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

Thanks for your bug. What version of dbus is installed? Is the session bus running?

Changed in epiphany:
assignee: nobody → desktop-bugs
Revision history for this message
Robert Collins (lifeless) wrote : Re: [Bug 29906] epiphany does not start - complains about dbus proxy

On Sat, 2006-01-28 at 11:41 +0000, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Public bug report changed:
> https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/29906
>
> Comment:
> Thanks for your bug. What version of dbus is installed? Is the session
> bus running?

ii libdbus-1-2 0.60-2ubuntu10

how can I tell if the sessions dbus is running?

Rob

--
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.

Revision history for this message
Robert Collins (lifeless) wrote :

dbus-daemon is not running, not is DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS set.

Revision history for this message
Robert Collins (lifeless) wrote :

turns out dbus was not installed. Should epiphany not depend on dbus if it needs it ?

Revision history for this message
Sebastian Dröge (slomo) wrote :

epiphany has libdbus-1-2 (>= 0.60), libdbus-glib-1-2 (>= 0.60) in Depends... but it probably should also Depend on dbus itself because it doesn't work at all without it... what's your oppinion on this, Sebastien?

Revision history for this message
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

That's why that bug is still open, I will add the Depends for the next upload (I'm supposed to do that for some uploads now). Shouldn't the Depends be on dbus-1-utils rather though?

Revision history for this message
Sebastian Dröge (slomo) wrote :

Why dbus-1-utils? It only contains /usr/bin/dbus-viewer and /usr/bin/dbus-monitor which is completely not needed... (btw, you could remove dbus-1-utils from ubuntu-desktop)

Revision history for this message
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

Because
$ dlocate /etc/X11/Xsession.d/75dbus-1-utils_dbus-launch
dbus-1-utils: /etc/X11/Xsession.d/75dbus-1-utils_dbus-launch

but
$ dlocate /etc/X11/Xsession.d/75dbus_dbus-launch
dbus: /etc/X11/Xsession.d/75dbus_dbus-launch

so right, dbus is enough but why does dbus-1-utils ship that too so?

Revision history for this message
Sebastian Dröge (slomo) wrote :

Uh it shouldn't... are you sure this file is still there? The one from dbus-1-utils should be removed in preinst unless you have an old version of it... see bug #31998

Revision history for this message
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

as indicated by my previous comment the file is installed, I'll have a look on it later

Revision history for this message
Sebastian Dröge (slomo) wrote :

Thanks... that's really weird

Revision history for this message
Barry deFreese (bddebian) wrote :

OK, lots of comments gentlemen. Has this been resolved? Thank you.

Changed in epiphany-browser:
status: Unconfirmed → Needs Info
Revision history for this message
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

Sebastian, the preinst for dbus uses "0.60-6ubunt6", note the typo to "ubuntu", should I open a bug about that?

This upload fixes the Depends issue:

 epiphany-browser (2.14.1-0ubuntu5) dapper; urgency=low
 .
   * debian/control.in:
     - Depends on dbus since it's required (Ubuntu: #29906)

Changed in epiphany-browser:
status: Needs Info → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Sebastian Dröge (slomo) wrote :

Thanks for noticing this *sigh*
No need for a bugreport, I'll get this fixed now :)

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Duplicates of this bug

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.