Installer's bootloader configuration needs a lot of usability work
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
linux (Ubuntu) |
Expired
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
IMHO the installer, compared to that of something like SuSE, is really lacking in the areas of partitioning and bootloader. The bootloader configuration was very unusable. it did not seem to recognize my existing bootloader (at least if it did it gave no indication of such), and so I told it not to install grub (since I was concerned about loosing access to my other distro). I hoped that by choosing "do not install" it would simply add some lines to the existing grub. Unfortunately that was not the case and I still needed to boot up SuSE and manually edit grub. I couldn't find any examples of grub code for 8.10 on the Internet, so I had to make it up. I got somewhat inferior, yet functional results.
Thank you for taking the time to make Ubuntu better. Since what you submitted is a Feature Request to improve Ubuntu, you are invited to post your idea in Ubuntu Brainstorm at [WWW] https:/ /brainstorm. ubuntu. com/ where it can be discussed, voted by the community and reviewed by developers. Thanks for taking the time to share your opinion!