[Karmic] SecurityFS fails to mount at boot

Bug #380326 reported by Claudio Moretti
This bug report is a duplicate of:  Bug #375422: apparmor fails to load at startup. Edit Remove
260
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
linux (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

At boot, I can see that SecurityFS is fails to mount.
I have disabled usplash, so I can see the string (now via tty1)

Mounting securityfs on /sys/kernel/security [fail]

Attached, my dmesg.

Karmic alpha1 x86_64, kernel 2.6.30-5-generic, main FS: ext4 (possible data corruption/loss?

Revision history for this message
Claudio Moretti (flyingstar16) wrote :
security vulnerability: no → yes
affects: ubuntu → linux (Ubuntu)
Revision history for this message
andy_spoo (tungsten) wrote :

I'm also getting this problem since updating 4 minutes ago.

Revision history for this message
andy_spoo (tungsten) wrote :
Download full text (28.0 KiB)

My smesg :-

[ 0.004000] Memory: 1017248k/1047424k available (4339k kernel code, 29292k reserved, 2009k data, 516k init, 138120k highmem)
[ 0.004000] virtual kernel memory layout:
[ 0.004000] fixmap : 0xfff4d000 - 0xfffff000 ( 712 kB)
[ 0.004000] pkmap : 0xff800000 - 0xffc00000 (4096 kB)
[ 0.004000] vmalloc : 0xf7ffe000 - 0xff7fe000 ( 120 MB)
[ 0.004000] lowmem : 0xc0000000 - 0xf77fe000 ( 887 MB)
[ 0.004000] .init : 0xc073b000 - 0xc07bc000 ( 516 kB)
[ 0.004000] .data : 0xc053cf8e - 0xc0733708 (2009 kB)
[ 0.004000] .text : 0xc0100000 - 0xc053cf8e (4339 kB)
[ 0.004000] Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in supervisor mode...Ok.
[ 0.004000] SLUB: Genslabs=13, HWalign=128, Order=0-3, MinObjects=0, CPUs=4, Nodes=1
[ 0.004010] Calibrating delay loop (skipped), value calculated using timer frequency.. 6029.14 BogoMIPS (lpj=12058292)
[ 0.004039] Security Framework initialized
[ 0.004047] SELinux: Disabled at boot.
[ 0.004056] Mount-cache hash table entries: 512
[ 0.004225] Initializing cgroup subsys ns
[ 0.004230] Initializing cgroup subsys cpuacct
[ 0.004235] Initializing cgroup subsys memory
[ 0.004245] Initializing cgroup subsys freezer
[ 0.004248] Initializing cgroup subsys net_cls
[ 0.004269] CPU: Trace cache: 12K uops, L1 D cache: 16K
[ 0.004273] CPU: L2 cache: 1024K
[ 0.004276] CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0
[ 0.004278] CPU: Processor Core ID: 0
[ 0.004282] using mwait in idle threads.
[ 0.004293] Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK.
[ 0.023199] ACPI: Core revision 20090320
[ 0.036314] ..TIMER: vector=0x30 apic1=0 pin1=2 apic2=-1 pin2=-1
[ 0.076006] CPU0: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz stepping 01
[ 0.080001] Booting processor 1 APIC 0x1 ip 0x6000
[ 0.004000] Initializing CPU#1
[ 0.004000] Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 6029.37 BogoMIPS (lpj=12058746)
[ 0.004000] CPU: Trace cache: 12K uops, L1 D cache: 16K
[ 0.004000] CPU: L2 cache: 1024K
[ 0.004000] CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0
[ 0.004000] CPU: Processor Core ID: 0
[ 0.164400] CPU1: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz stepping 01
[ 0.164422] checking TSC synchronization [CPU#0 -> CPU#1]: passed.
[ 0.168026] Brought up 2 CPUs
[ 0.168032] Total of 2 processors activated (12058.51 BogoMIPS).
[ 0.168087] CPU0 attaching sched-domain:
[ 0.168091] domain 0: span 0-1 level SIBLING
[ 0.168095] groups: 0 1
[ 0.168103] CPU1 attaching sched-domain:
[ 0.168105] domain 0: span 0-1 level SIBLING
[ 0.168108] groups: 1 0
[ 0.168204] net_namespace: 1056 bytes
[ 0.168204] Booting paravirtualized kernel on bare hardware
[ 0.168256] regulator: core version 0.5
[ 0.168256] Time: 18:59:53 Date: 06/23/09
[ 0.168256] NET: Registered protocol family 16
[ 0.168256] EISA bus registered
[ 0.168256] ACPI: bus type pci registered
[ 0.168256] PCI: Found Intel Corporation 945G/GZ/P/PL Express Memory Controller Hub with MMCONFIG support.
[ 0.168256] PCI: MCFG configuration 0: base e0000000 segment 0 buses 0 - 255
[ 0.168256] PCI: MCFG area at e0000000 reserved in E820
[...

Revision history for this message
Claudio Moretti (flyingstar16) wrote :

Andy, this bug is a duplicate of bug #375422.
Please, comment there and not here, because this bug report is not valid.

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public Security information  
Everyone can see this security related information.

Other bug subscribers

Bug attachments

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.