libflash should be named gplflash
Bug #3829 reported by
Jeroen
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| libflash (Ubuntu) |
Invalid
|
Medium
|
MOTU | ||
Bug Description
libflash should be named gplflash. People get confused because they think gplflash is not in the repositories.
Suggestion:
libflash-dev - gplflash-dev
libflash-mozplugin - gplflash-plugin or gplflash-mozplugin
libflash-swfplayer - gplflash-player or gplflash-swfplayer
libflash0c2 - gplflash orgplflash0c2 (I don't know what the 0cs means!)
I will (try to) look into it myself.
| Changed in libflash: | |
| assignee: | nobody → motu |
Revision history for this message
| Jorge Bernal (koke) wrote | #1 |
Revision history for this message
| Jeroen (jeroenubuntu) wrote | #2 |
| Changed in libflash: | |
| status: | Unconfirmed → Needs Info |
Revision history for this message
| Rocco Stanzione (trappist) wrote | #3 |
| Changed in libflash: | |
| status: | Needs Info → Rejected |
To post a comment you must log in.
I think that would break the debian policy, but I have to check it.
Anyway a fair solution for all could be have a gplflash metapackage installing the plugin and the player (so the library would get installed to as a dependency)