[ubuntu karmic] 720Watt netbooks?

Bug #451557 reported by ullix
16
This bug affects 3 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu)
Expired
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: gnome-power-manager

The gnome-power-manager (2.28.0) has multiple problems on my netbook, but the most obvious nonsense is to report being charged at 720 Watts of my netbook AcerAspireOne 110L .
attached screenshots show graph type 'Rate'
cold boot on battery: after a cold boot. Reported Power of about 10+Watt seems reasonable.

plug-in/plug-out: at about 5.8min the netbook was plugged-in to power. The power jumps to 720Watt, which is obvious nonsense. At 2min the netbook was unplugged, and runs again on battery. After some blank period the graph continuous at about 10W.

Revision history for this message
ullix (ullix) wrote :
Revision history for this message
ullix (ullix) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Peter Cherriman (pjcherriman) wrote :

I'm getting the same on my Acer Aspire 110L also.

Its also not the only gnome power problem I'm having in karmic, see bug #393008

Revision history for this message
Victor Vargas (kamus) wrote :

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Could you please open a terminal and execute: apport-collect 451557 ? It will attach the necessary information to this report. Also you can submit more information for it by looking to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingGNOMEPowerManager , Thanks in advance.

Changed in gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu):
status: New → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Peter Cherriman (pjcherriman) wrote : apport-collect data

Architecture: i386
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
Package: gnome-power-manager 2.28.1-0ubuntu1
PackageArchitecture: i386
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-17.54-generic
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-17-generic i686
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare

Revision history for this message
Peter Cherriman (pjcherriman) wrote : Dependencies.txt
Revision history for this message
Peter Cherriman (pjcherriman) wrote : DevkitPower.txt
Revision history for this message
Peter Cherriman (pjcherriman) wrote : GConfNonDefault.txt
Revision history for this message
Peter Cherriman (pjcherriman) wrote : XsessionErrors.txt
Revision history for this message
Peter Cherriman (pjcherriman) wrote : gnome-power-bugreport.txt
Changed in gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu):
status: Incomplete → New
tags: added: apport-collected
Revision history for this message
ullix (ullix) wrote : apport-collect data

Architecture: i386
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release i386 (20091028.5)
Package: gnome-power-manager 2.28.1-0ubuntu1.3
PackageArchitecture: i386
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-18.55-generic
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-18-generic i686
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout dip lpadmin mythtv netdev plugdev sambashare
XsessionErrors:
 (gnome-settings-daemon:1626): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed
 (gnome-settings-daemon:1626): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed
 (nautilus:1722): Eel-CRITICAL **: eel_preferences_get_boolean: assertion `preferences_is_initialized ()' failed
 (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:1743): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed
 (thunderbird-bin:4190): GLib-WARNING **: g_set_prgname() called multiple times

Revision history for this message
ullix (ullix) wrote : Dependencies.txt
Revision history for this message
ullix (ullix) wrote : DevkitPower.txt
Revision history for this message
ullix (ullix) wrote : GConfNonDefault.txt
Revision history for this message
ullix (ullix) wrote : gnome-power-bugreport.txt
Revision history for this message
ullix (ullix) wrote :

If I am not mistaken then the above apport-collect data say that the charge rate is 0W, not 720W. (That is closer to the real 10W, but still not satisfactory ;-)) . I therefore checked the power history and saw no power data collected for the last week, although this computer was continuously on for a few days. I then clicked a few tabs and graphing options on the Power Statistics history and voila, the 720W is back!

I do the apport-collect again right now, and expect it to show 720W charging:

Revision history for this message
ullix (ullix) wrote : apport-collect data

Architecture: i386
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release i386 (20091028.5)
Package: gnome-power-manager 2.28.1-0ubuntu1.3
PackageArchitecture: i386
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-18.55-generic
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-18-generic i686
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout dip lpadmin mythtv netdev plugdev sambashare
XsessionErrors:
 (gnome-settings-daemon:1626): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed
 (gnome-settings-daemon:1626): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed
 (nautilus:1722): Eel-CRITICAL **: eel_preferences_get_boolean: assertion `preferences_is_initialized ()' failed
 (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:1743): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed
 (thunderbird-bin:4190): GLib-WARNING **: g_set_prgname() called multiple times

Revision history for this message
ullix (ullix) wrote : Dependencies.txt
Revision history for this message
ullix (ullix) wrote : DevkitPower.txt
Revision history for this message
ullix (ullix) wrote : GConfNonDefault.txt
Revision history for this message
ullix (ullix) wrote : gnome-power-bugreport.txt
Revision history for this message
ullix (ullix) wrote :

... and back to 720W we are!

Revision history for this message
Pedro Villavicencio (pedro) wrote :

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. A new version of GNOME Power Manager is available on Maverick and we are wondering if this bug is still an issue for you with that version? Could you please test and comment back? Thanks in advance.

Changed in gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu):
status: New → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
ullix (ullix) wrote :

compare with Bug #413799

I am now running Lucid on my netbook, and the history and stats as shown by the gnome-power-manager do seem to be realistic.

However, I do note one logical glitch in the display of "Time to empty": when this time is, let's say, 2h, and the AC power is connected, the Time to empty shows 0h (zero hours). If anything, this should be infinity, though simply omitting a data point of zero might be more adequate.

Likewise, when AC is connected and the removed, the "Time to full" is shown as 0s (zero second). That would also have to be infinity (or again omitted altogether).

Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

[Expired for gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.]

Changed in gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu):
status: Incomplete → Expired
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.