Redundancy for cloud and cluster controller (HA)
Bug #497087 reported by
Torsten Spindler
This bug affects 4 people
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eucalyptus |
Invalid
|
Wishlist
|
chris grzegorczyk | ||
| eucalyptus (Ubuntu) |
Confirmed
|
Wishlist
|
Unassigned | ||
Bug Description
A question that came up in every UEC class I've run so far was how to make the cloud and cluster controller redundant, so the cloud is more resilient to failures of those components. Are there any suggestions out there how to achieve this?
| Changed in eucalyptus (Ubuntu): | |
| importance: | Undecided → Wishlist |
Revision history for this message
| Nick Barcet (nijaba) wrote Re: [Bug 497087] [NEW] Redundancy for cloud and cluster controller | #1 |
| Changed in eucalyptus (Ubuntu): | |
| status: | New → Confirmed |
| Changed in eucalyptus: | |
| status: | New → Confirmed |
| importance: | Undecided → Wishlist |
Revision history for this message
| Dustin Kirkland (kirkland) wrote Re: Redundancy for cloud and cluster controller | #2 |
| Changed in eucalyptus: | |
| status: | Confirmed → Triaged |
| summary: |
- Redundancy for cloud and cluster controller + Redundancy for cloud and cluster controller (HA) |
| Changed in eucalyptus: | |
| assignee: | nobody → chris grzegorczyk (chris-grze) |
Revision history for this message
| graziano obertelli (graziano.obertelli) wrote | #3 |
| Changed in eucalyptus: | |
| status: | Triaged → Invalid |
To post a comment you must log in.
I discussed this a bit with eucalyptus and there is no obvious ways to
do this without modification in the code at the moment. Has to do with
the way and state handling is currently done and meta data is stored.
They do plan to work on this in the future.