location of merge proposal status in email is confusing

I received an e-mail from a merge proposal with the following body:

Review: Approve code
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Brian Murray <email address hidden> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 01:06:29PM -0000, Michael Nelson wrote:
>> Review: Needs Information code
>> Hi Brian,
>>
>> Nice change and tests. I'm a bit confused by the bug though. From what
>> I've understood, suppress_notify should be False by default so that
>> when Joe subscribes Elsie else via the API and *doesn't* use the
>> suppress_notify arg, Elsie will receive an email letting her know that
>> she's been subscribed.
>>
>> So, 3 points:
>> 1) How does this prevent abuse? If I want to abuse the feature I just
>> use the suppress_notify=True. Shouldn't we instead be changing the
>> default to False as you have and leaving it unexposed so that people
>> can't abuse this via the API? I couldn't see any discussion about this
>> on the bug.
>
> I'm under the impression that using @call_with means that it will not be
> usable as an operation parameter of subscribe via the API interface and
> subsequently notifications will always be sent when someone is
> subscribed via the API.

And you're right, of course - sorry I misread @call_with... I was thinking of @operation_parameters.

----

Because the reviewer's reply was contextual I completely read over the "Review: Approve code" bit and started reading their comments only. I think this might be avoided by at least inserting a line of white space between the status and the "On Thu" bit. Even better would be to have an X-Launchpad-Merge-Proposal status or something in the e-mail headers.