Please merge 2.7.0-11 from debian unstable

Bug #72274 reported by Laurent Bigonville
2
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
fam (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
MOTU

Bug Description

Hi,

Please merge 2.7.0-11 from debian unstable

Packages available at: http://bigon.be/vrac/fam/

Revision history for this message
Laurent Bigonville (bigon) wrote :

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 02:21:14 +0100
Source: fam
Binary: libfam0 fam libfam-dev
Architecture: source
Version: 2.7.0-11ubuntu1
Distribution: feisty
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Chuan-kai Lin <email address hidden>
Changed-By: Laurent Bigonville <email address hidden>
Description:
 fam - File Alteration Monitor
 libfam-dev - Client library to control the FAM daemon - development files
 libfam0 - Client library to control the FAM daemon
Closes: 378116 381423 384860
Changes:
 fam (2.7.0-11ubuntu1) feisty; urgency=low
 .
   [ Ubuntu Merge-o-Matic ]
   * Merge from debian unstable.
 .
   [ Laurent Bigonville ]
   * Fix debian/control.
   * debian/fam.init: Use the debian one.
 .
 fam (2.7.0-11) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Force pasv in watch file to avoid empty FTP indices
   * Include memory-leak patch by David Price (closes: #381423)
   * Use LSB init-functions from lsb-base (closes: #378116, #384860)
   * Update to Standards-Version 3.7.2.0
   * Relax the dependency of dummy package libfam0c102 to
     >= ${Source-Version} instead of requiring strict equality
Files:
 810c4d529389d28e5ed70f7ad1eafeab 647 admin optional fam_2.7.0-11ubuntu1.dsc
 dcb25b20e172d75b3343ab7d9f8dacf6 23950 admin optional fam_2.7.0-11ubuntu1.diff.gz

Changed in fam:
assignee: nobody → motu
Revision history for this message
Soren Hansen (soren) wrote :

didn't notice this bug report before I filed my sync request. Can you explain why we shouldn't just sync fam from debian. the only change that remains is really just the libfam0c102 removal. In the debian package is just a dummy package depending on libfam0 which seems very innocent to me.

Revision history for this message
Laurent Bigonville (bigon) wrote :

Yep you right, I close this bugrepport as a dup of yours

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.