Ubuntu
gtetrinet package

Crashes on first startup

Bug #73720 reported by Jordi Mallach
4
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
GTetrinet
Fix Released
High
gtetrinet (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

GTetrinet up to version 0.7.11 contained a bug which made it crash when it was first started by a user. Subsequent executions would work correctly, as the gtetrinet GConf tree was already initialised in the user's homedir.

This was fixed in 0.7.12, and the patch is trivial.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=75845&action=view

Revision history for this message
Jordi Mallach (jordi) wrote :

I'm requesting the MOTU-SRU team to consider fixing this bug in Edgy, as the new bug buddy is making the upstream developers get duplicate bug reports nearly on a daily basis.

This was fixed in Debian's source package in 0.7.10-2, by applying the above patch, and by upstream in version 0.7.12.

For reference, the upstream bug report is http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114425

Thanks.

Revision history for this message
Jordi Mallach (jordi) wrote :

Err, there's a big flaw in my comments above. The bug was present up to 0.7.10, and was fixed in 0.7.11. 0.7.12 does not exist yet.

Revision history for this message
ville palo (vi64pa) wrote :

Thanks, I'll create a SRU request and debdiff for this.

Changed in gtetrinet:
assignee: nobody → vi64pa
status: Unconfirmed → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
StefanPotyra (sistpoty) wrote :

@Jordi:

FYI the motu-sru team is not the team that will create bug fixes itself, but rather approve/reject updates which have an SRU report filed already. So please subscribe motu-sru only if you've got such an report already.

See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/SRU for details.

Thanks,
     Stefan.

Bug Watch Updater (bug-watch-updater)
Changed in gtetrinet:
status: Unknown → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
ville palo (vi64pa) wrote :
  • - Edit (2.1 KiB, text/plain)

debidff attached

Revision history for this message
ville palo (vi64pa) wrote :

Another one with better paths

Revision history for this message
StefanPotyra (sistpoty) wrote :

Hi,

the patch looks sane (finally an easy one again :), but you miss a bug number in the debdiff (the XXXX).

Also please don't add a patch system in case there isn't one in the package already.

Cheers,
     Stefan.

Revision history for this message
ville palo (vi64pa) wrote :

SRU request: bug #74133

Revision history for this message
ville palo (vi64pa) wrote :

this doesn't happen on feisty anymore.

William Grant (wgrant)
Changed in gtetrinet:
assignee: vi64pa → nobody
status: Confirmed → Fix Released
Bug Watch Updater (bug-watch-updater)
Changed in gtetrinet:
importance: Unknown → High
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.
Subscribing...

Other bug subscribers

Bug attachments

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.