AppendRevisionsOnlyViolation in import_package
Bug #806425 reported by
Andrew Bennetts
This bug affects 1 person
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ubuntu Distributed Development |
Fix Released
|
Critical
|
Vincent Ladeuil |
Bug Description
This appears to be fallout from the fix for bug 248418: http://
Currently affected imports:
http://
http://
http://
http://
http://
As this is a regression we may want to consider reverting r483 of lp:udd (the fix for bug 248418).
Related branches
lp:~vila/udd/806425-append-revs-only
- Jelmer Vernooij (community): Approve
-
Diff: 48 lines (+5/-5)1 file modifiedimport_package.py (+5/-5)
Changed in udd: | |
assignee: | nobody → Andrew Bennetts (spiv) |
Changed in udd: | |
assignee: | Andrew Bennetts (spiv) → Vincent Ladeuil (vila) |
status: | Confirmed → In Progress |
To post a comment you must log in.
On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 11:14:44 -0000, Andrew Bennetts <email address hidden> wrote: package- ubuntu. com/status/ b3ba0ccc332f824 0c26d74e6f44c99 7c.html package- import. ubuntu. com/status/ ikvm.html package- import. ubuntu. com/status/ libmailtools- perl.html package- import. ubuntu. com/status/ libcap- ng.html package- import. ubuntu. com/status/ schroot. html package- import. ubuntu. com/status/ pacpl.html
> Public bug reported:
>
> This appears to be fallout from the fix for bug 248418: http://
> import.
>
> Currently affected imports:
>
> http://
> http://
> http://
> http://
> http://
>
> As this is a regression we may want to consider reverting r483 of lp:udd
> (the fix for bug 248418).
This looks like append_ revisions_ only is inherited to me?
I don't think that's what we want.
It did make me realise that there are occaisions that we push
--overwrite to Launchpad though (in the case of collisions at minimum),
and I don't think we can get rid of that without rethinking the way we
do that. Is there a way to override the setting temporarily, or do you
have to change it and change it back? I guess you could do that under a
write lock, which would be much like overriding temporarily?
Thanks,
James