multiload indicator icons are too small on gnome classic & shell

Bug #927303 reported by Thomas
154
This bug affects 31 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
indicator-multiload (Ubuntu)
Confirmed
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

I wanted to switch from unity shell to gnome3 classic shell but now the indicator is really really small. I will attach a screenshot.

You see the indicator right of the battery symbol.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: gnome-shell 3.2.2.1-0ubuntu1
Package: indicator-multiload 0.2-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-14.23-generic-pae 3.2.3
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-14-generic-pae i686
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
ApportVersion: 1.91-0ubuntu1
Architecture: i386
Date: Sun Feb 5 21:40:06 2012
EcryptfsInUse: Yes
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Alpha i386 (20120201.1)
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: indicator-multiload
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

Revision history for this message
Thomas (t.c) wrote :
Thomas (t.c)
description: updated
description: updated
summary: - icons really small
+ multiload indicator icons are too small on gnome classic
Thomas (t.c)
affects: gnome-shell → gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
Revision history for this message
Michael Hofmann (mh21) wrote : Re: multiload indicator icons are too small on gnome classic

It looks like the indicator is forced to a standard-icon-width, regardless of how wide the indicator actually is. Could you check whether disabling some of the graphs/reducing the width of the graphs increases the size of the indicator?

Thomas (t.c)
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Thomas (t.c) wrote :

Ok... I did the test: the size not change, when I close other indicators (Dropbox, Remmina, ....)

Revision history for this message
Thomas (t.c) wrote :

I also tested to change the size in the multiload-indicator settings, but it also not change.

I know, in ocelot there was no problem like this (I used Gnome Classic and the multiload-indicator without any problem) - no there must be somewhere a change :-(

Revision history for this message
Thomas (t.c) wrote :

I did a new test: when I deselected all resources to display and left only one it looks ok.
But when I add resources the complete size not change and the "resource blocks" get smaller.

Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

Changed in gnome-shell (Ubuntu):
status: New → Confirmed
Changed in indicator-multiload (Ubuntu):
status: New → Confirmed
Jeremy Bícha (jbicha)
no longer affects: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
Revision history for this message
Thomas (t.c) wrote :

in gnome-shell is the same problem visible... not only classic shell.

any updates?

summary: - multiload indicator icons are too small on gnome classic
+ multiload indicator icons are too small on gnome classic & shell
Revision history for this message
Marinus (mbjunk21) wrote :

I think I have the same bug with Cinnamon. Running indicator-multiload from a terminal gives the attached output. Will running apport-collect 927303 help?

Revision history for this message
Tim Cowlishaw (mistertim) wrote :

Am also experiencing this in a custom setup using gnome-panel with xmonad. Screenshot attached. Adding and removing indicators (or changing the width of each indicator) adjusts the size of the indicator area, but it's still tiny.

Revision history for this message
Pander (pander) wrote :

For GNOME Shell it is indeed too small, see screenshot. The height should be increased.

Revision history for this message
Pander (pander) wrote :
Pander (pander)
tags: added: 12.10
Revision history for this message
Theredbaron (theredbaron1834) wrote :

This also effects me, and has since I first heard of it a year or so ago. However, I use both XFCE4-Panel and LXpanel. It effects them both the same. I still use it, as it is great. This is annoying though, as I can only use 1 monitor.

I decided to add a comment here, as I don't know if this would be the same "bug" for gnome classic as the XFCE/LXDE ones. Should I start a new bug report? Or would it go with this one? Or is XFCE/LXDE even supported?

Revision history for this message
Fredrik Eldh (fredrik-eldh) wrote :

This bug started affecting me when I upgraded my Xubuntu 12.04 machine to 12.10.

Revision history for this message
Mark Browning (mabrowningrr) wrote :

This indicator works by continuously generating a new icons (png), stored at (on my machine, at least, /var/lock/multiload-icons-$RANDOM/ ). These png are the correct size, so I don't think this is an issue with multiload-indicator.

I think the blame lies with the indicator service; in my case, it is gnome-panel (as far as I can tell).

Revision history for this message
jesse (jesse) wrote :

I also upgraded my Xubuntu (XFCE) from 12.04 to 12.10 and hit this issue. Makes the indicator pretty much unusable.

Revision history for this message
Andris Berzins (pkix) wrote :

The same problem with xubuntu un 12.10.

Revision history for this message
Derek Chen-Becker (dchenbecker) wrote :

OK, this is a little odd (and may not be reproducible). I just upgraded my video card and during configuration accidentally enabled xinerama, which resulted in a weird issue with gnome-panel containing multiples of each item. The issue (and fix, see answer 1) is described here:

http://askubuntu.com/questions/133647/gnome-panel-has-multiple-rows-how-to-undo-that

After I used dconf-editor to reset to the defaults shown in that post, my multiload indicator is normal width again (100px)! I used the exact settings described in the post:

object-id-list ['menu-bar', 'indicators', 'show-desktop', 'window-list', 'workspace-switcher']
toplevel-id-list ['top-panel', 'bottom-panel']

Not sure if this will work for anyone else, but it's really nice to have my indicators back...

Revision history for this message
Fredrik Eldh (fredrik-eldh) wrote :

I tried to apply Derek's fix, but I don't have gnome-panel installed, so I couldn't do it.

Installing gnome-panel is not very nice, because it has 198 dependencies, but I tried it anyway. object-id-list and toplevel-id-list were empty; each contained only []. I then set them to Derek's settings and rebooted. No effect. :(

Revision history for this message
Derek Chen-Becker (dchenbecker) wrote :

Fredrik, sorry to hear it didn't work. This is a machine that's been upgraded from 10.04 through intermediary releases, and I use gnome-classic as my shell, so it's possible I have some fortuitous combination of cruft that gets it going.

Revision history for this message
Fredrik Eldh (fredrik-eldh) wrote :

Aye, I use the default XFCE shell.

Revision history for this message
Pablo Lalloni (plalloni) wrote :

Same problema here.

Any one has any clue on what might be causing this?

Revision history for this message
Michael Hofmann (mh21) wrote :

Could you check whether the version at https://launchpad.net/~indicator-multiload/+archive/daily fixes the problem with the indicator being to small?

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.