pva wrote:
> Heh, this issue again is discussed in gentoo-dev:
> http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_69e16fcf1b760849695165de80e22b1d.xml
>
> Site:
> "In my test (GNU Emacs BZR repo, 2 Mbit/s connection) bzr export took 54 minutes, whereas the initial checkout took only 11 minutes."
>
> This is really weird.
>
It isn't that weird. We focused on checkout performance because it is
something we do all the time. We haven't tried to optimize export
performance, because it is not nearly as frequent.
If you are adding to this exporting over a network connection, I'm
pretty sure the big factor is that we are requesting file contents
one-at-a-time rather than all-at-once. I don't think it would be hard to
address for someone who cared.
John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
pva wrote: archives. gentoo. org/gentoo- dev/msg_ 69e16fcf1b76084 9695165de80e22b 1d.xml
> Heh, this issue again is discussed in gentoo-dev:
> http://
>
> Site:
> "In my test (GNU Emacs BZR repo, 2 Mbit/s connection) bzr export took 54 minutes, whereas the initial checkout took only 11 minutes."
>
> This is really weird.
>
It isn't that weird. We focused on checkout performance because it is
something we do all the time. We haven't tried to optimize export
performance, because it is not nearly as frequent.
If you are adding to this exporting over a network connection, I'm
pretty sure the big factor is that we are requesting file contents
one-at-a-time rather than all-at-once. I don't think it would be hard to
address for someone who cared.
John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- enigmail. mozdev. org/
npesACgkQJdeBCY SNAAPxHwCZAWze5 +bDuDv6uQZ/ nvYceNjX KaAeAvZ7SSweDq6 CDl2GwOj+
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://
iEYEARECAAYFAks
nywAoIA+
=o5lo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----