Robert Collins wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 02:16 +0000, Jonathan Lange wrote:
>
>> Rob asked me to check out the bad merge claims.
>>
>> I've tried investigating them, but I keep getting format errors, so I'm
>> moving this back down to fix committed.
>>
>
> Format errors?
>
>
It looks like the wrong revision was approved as far as I can tell, but
it's quite possibly some mistake I have made in the processes. The
revision merged into the trunk was my first attempt as it were and not
the preferred version agreed with Martin Pool, so somewhere along the
line the 'old' attempt was approved instead of the new one I guess.
Robert Collins wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 02:16 +0000, Jonathan Lange wrote:
>
>> Rob asked me to check out the bad merge claims.
>>
>> I've tried investigating them, but I keep getting format errors, so I'm
>> moving this back down to fix committed.
>>
>
> Format errors?
>
>
It looks like the wrong revision was approved as far as I can tell, but
it's quite possibly some mistake I have made in the processes. The
revision merged into the trunk was my first attempt as it were and not
the preferred version agreed with Martin Pool, so somewhere along the
line the 'old' attempt was approved instead of the new one I guess.