It does seem to be more of a data issue than an API issue. These mixed up covers look like different volumes from the same series (or something along those lines).
One other comment I want to add (for anyone else poking) is that we seem to be using the Read "multi-request format" even when only having one identifier. I'm sure that's fine to do, but it just threw me for a second to see:
It does seem to be more of a data issue than an API issue. These mixed up covers look like different volumes from the same series (or something along those lines).
One other comment I want to add (for anyone else poking) is that we seem to be using the Read "multi-request format" even when only having one identifier. I'm sure that's fine to do, but it just threw me for a second to see:
http:// openlibrary. org/api/ volumes/ brief/json/ isbn:0195029216
instead of:
http:// openlibrary. org/api/ volumes/ brief/isbn/ 0195029216. json
They give the same results other than one extra layer of wrapping, so again, this looks just fine from an API perspective.