I'm targeting this as a bug at 3.0 and 3.1 because it is a departure from the XUL behavior, and it is my understanding that these are considered bugs.
I've pushed a signoff branch for master and rel_3_1 here: collab/dyrcona/lp1788417-yes-no-in-grids-signoff
http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=working/Evergreen.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/collab/dyrcona/lp1788417-yes-no-in-grids-signoff
And, one for rel_3_0 with conflict resolution here: collab/dyrcona/lp1788417-yes-no-in-grids-rel_3_0-signoff
http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=working/Evergreen.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/collab/dyrcona/lp1788417-yes-no-in-grids-rel_3_0-signoff
I signed off instead of just pushing in case Chris Sharp or someone else also wanted to have a look.
I'm targeting this as a bug at 3.0 and 3.1 because it is a departure from the XUL behavior, and it is my understanding that these are considered bugs.
I've pushed a signoff branch for master and rel_3_1 here: collab/ dyrcona/ lp1788417- yes-no- in-grids- signoff
http:// git.evergreen- ils.org/ ?p=working/ Evergreen. git;a=shortlog; h=refs/ heads/collab/ dyrcona/ lp1788417- yes-no- in-grids- signoff
And, one for rel_3_0 with conflict resolution here: collab/ dyrcona/ lp1788417- yes-no- in-grids- rel_3_0- signoff
http:// git.evergreen- ils.org/ ?p=working/ Evergreen. git;a=shortlog; h=refs/ heads/collab/ dyrcona/ lp1788417- yes-no- in-grids- rel_3_0- signoff
I signed off instead of just pushing in case Chris Sharp or someone else also wanted to have a look.