So the question is, should admins be able to promote (and demote) admins, or should only owners be able to make admins.
The original report wasn't a request for admins to promote admins, but for clarity about who can in the UI.
For now, I don't think we have any evidence suggesting our decision that owners choose admins, and admins do all day-to-day was wrong.
If anything, I think we possibly want clearer separation - e.g. team renaming is possibly an owner-only thing; admin promotion/demotion owner-only etc.
I'm going to put this back towards being a statement of confusing UI rather than a possibly mistaken change in admin-management rules.
So the question is, should admins be able to promote (and demote) admins, or should only owners be able to make admins.
The original report wasn't a request for admins to promote admins, but for clarity about who can in the UI.
For now, I don't think we have any evidence suggesting our decision that owners choose admins, and admins do all day-to-day was wrong.
If anything, I think we possibly want clearer separation - e.g. team renaming is possibly an owner-only thing; admin promotion/demotion owner-only etc.
I'm going to put this back towards being a statement of confusing UI rather than a possibly mistaken change in admin-management rules.