Comment 14 for bug 519709

On Sun, 2011-05-29 at 23:39 +0000, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
> On Fri, 27 May 2011 19:47:01 -0000, Martin Pool <email address hidden> wrote:
> > @Jelmer should the bzr-hg task of this bug be closed?
> >
> > I believe we were blocked on the update because of the change in
> > handling of incremental fetches and that is now fixed? So all that's
> > needed to close the lp side of this is to just actually push a bzr-hg
> > update into lp's dependencies, and probably also a new bzr?
>
> I don't know the details, but I'm fairly sure the incremental fetch
> stuff has never worked with bzr-hg, so updating just bzr-hg cannot
> possibly make this aspect worse.
The problem is that updating bzr-hg will require a newer bzr on
Launchpad too (current version is 2.2-something), and updating bzr will
require updating bzr-git/bzr-svn too - and they are affected by that
issue.

All of this is in progress, I've landed newer versions of bzr-svn,
subvertpy, dulwich, bzr and bzr-git on the Launchpad branches and I
think Diogo has landed a newer bzr-hg. There is some fallout in the
Launchpad tree that I hope to work on this week.

Cheers,

Jelmer