Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
> Confirmed -- I was one of the intended recipients. :-) Not sure of a
> good solution, though -- saying "these are not e-mail addresses" would
> work, but be heavy-handed. Perhaps we could group e-mail and Jabber
> addresses together, so that if you hide the former you also hide the
> latter.
We could display them as a jabber: url rather than just the jabber id. This
might also make them usefully clickable if your browser is setup to handle
the jabber: url space.
Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
> Confirmed -- I was one of the intended recipients. :-) Not sure of a
> good solution, though -- saying "these are not e-mail addresses" would
> work, but be heavy-handed. Perhaps we could group e-mail and Jabber
> addresses together, so that if you hide the former you also hide the
> latter.
We could display them as a jabber: url rather than just the jabber id. This
might also make them usefully clickable if your browser is setup to handle
the jabber: url space.
-- www.canonical. com/ www.ubuntu. com/
Stuart Bishop <email address hidden> http://
Canonical Ltd. http://