Comment 10 for bug 1197582

Is there v8 support yet for UEFI? Please let me know what hwpack this is
and I can give it a shot.

On 7 August 2013 09:50, Anmar Oueja <email address hidden> wrote:

> On 7 August 2013 12:09, Antonio Terceiro <email address hidden>
> wrote:
> > It's pretty hard to make this work properly with fastmodels because of
> > this crappy serial behavior.
> >
> > Is it a hard requirement that UEFI LAVA testing is done on fastmodels,
> > or can we get away with TC2 work?
>
> For v7, we can target TC2. However, for v8, RTSM models is all we
> have so we need it.
>
> Have you tried the v8 model. I wonder if it has the same problem.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of Linaro
> Validation Team, which is subscribed to LAVA Dispatcher.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1197582
>
> Title:
> UEFI shell color codes makes it impossible to parse output with
> pexpect.
>
> Status in LAVA Dispatcher:
> Confirmed
>
> Bug description:
> For reference:
>
> http://www.nwdrone.com/scheduler/job/1178/log_file
>
> [a] Boot Manager
> [b] Shell
> [c] Reboot
> [d] Shutdown
> Start:
> Invalid input, please choose a menu option from the list above
> Start: b
> [2J [01;01H [01;01HUEFI Interactive Shell v2.0. UEFI v2.31 (ARM
> Versatile Express EFI Jun 19 2013 21:21:03, 0x00000000). Revision 1.02
> [1m [33m [40mMapping table [0m [37m [40m
> [1m [33m [40m FS1: [0m [37m [40m [1m [37m [40mAlias(s): [0m [37m
> [40mF6:
> VenHw(C5B9C74A-6D72-4719-99AB-C59F199091EB)
> [1m [33m [40m FS0: [0m [37m [40m [1m [37m [40mAlias(s): [0m [37m
> [40mHD3b:;BLK2:
>
> VenHw(09831032-6FA3-4484-AF4F-0A000A8D3A82)/HD(1,MBR,0x00000000,0x3F,0x19FC0)
> [1m [33m [40m BLK6: [0m [37m [40m [1m [37m [40mAlias(s): [0m [37m
> [40m
> VenHw(E7223039-5836-41E1-B542-D7EC736C5E59)
> [1m [33m [40m BLK0: [0m [37m [40m [1m [37m [40mAlias(s): [0m [37m
> [40m
> VenHw(02118005-9DA7-443A-92D5-781F022AEDBB)
> [1m [33m [40m BLK4: [0m [37m [40m [1m [37m [40mAlias(s): [0m [37m
> [40m
> VenHw(1F15DA3C-37FF-4070-B471-BB4AF12A724A)
> [1m [33m [40m BLK5: [0m [37m [40m [1m [37m [40mAlias(s): [0m [37m
> [40m
> VenHw(CC2CBF29-1498-4CDD-8171-F8B6B41D0909)
> [1m [33m [40m BLK1: [0m [37m [40m [1m [37m [40mAlias(s): [0m [37m
> [40m
> VenHw(09831032-6FA3-4484-AF4F-0A000A8D3A82)
> [1m [33m [40m BLK3: [0m [37m [40m [1m [37m [40mAlias(s): [0m [37m
> [40m
>
> VenHw(09831032-6FA3-4484-AF4F-0A000A8D3A82)/HD(2,MBR,0x00000000,0x1A000,0x3CE000)
> [22;01HPress [1m [37m [40mESC [0m [37m [40m in 5 seconds to skip [1m
> [33m [40mstartup.nsh [0m [37m [40m or any other key to continue.
>
> As you can see from the job above, LAVA is unable to parse the output
> due to the presense of color codes used in the UEFI shell. This is a
> major blocker as LAVA cannot be used to test UEFI properly, and should
> be fixed ASAP.
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/lava-dispatcher/+bug/1197582/+subscriptions
>

--
Tyler Baker
Technical Architect, LAVA
Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro
http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog