Comment 18 for bug 849625

I understood we should use milestone to "tracking what's happening for the cycle", that sounds good and useful.

However in this case we mark a bug that I am pretty sure won't get any attention for 11.11 as "happening for the cycle". It won't get any attention because the code involved changed quite a bit already for 3.2 so we would be working on deprecated code, and 11.11 will presumably be 3.1 kernel. It seems pretty sure it's not "happening for the cycle".

Generally we won't spend much time on release kernel, it's better to spend the time fixing things on tracking and then 3.2 will come out in better shape from the start.

Maybe a good solution is package our tracking (tilt-tracking) without linux-linaro stuff in addition to release kernel. Then Wei Feng (who needed a binary kernel for last tests) can let us know if we changed anything for the better on 3.2 stuff.