On Tuesday 18 Mar 2014 23:34:23 Jason Hobbs wrote:
> On 03/18/2014 06:22 PM, Julian Edwards wrote:
> > On Tuesday 18 Mar 2014 11:47:44 you wrote:
> >> I just built a package with the following diff:
> >> http://paste.ubuntu.com/7113619/. Testing that package in the lab right
> >> now.
> >
> > This is the wrong fix.
> >
> > Something has happened to the code in node.py, I am sure it's not the same
> > as what I tested. The old code used to only do the MAC addition if it
> > was a power_type of WoL.
I meant AMT here of course... :/
> Is it possible the bugs being reported against the trusty package are
> due to only part of the implementation being pulled into the patch for
> trusty?
I don't think so, but never say never... I'm going to do a fix for this ASAP
and then we can forget about it.
On Tuesday 18 Mar 2014 23:34:23 Jason Hobbs wrote: paste.ubuntu. com/7113619/. Testing that package in the lab right
> On 03/18/2014 06:22 PM, Julian Edwards wrote:
> > On Tuesday 18 Mar 2014 11:47:44 you wrote:
> >> I just built a package with the following diff:
> >> http://
> >> now.
> >
> > This is the wrong fix.
> >
> > Something has happened to the code in node.py, I am sure it's not the same
> > as what I tested. The old code used to only do the MAC addition if it
> > was a power_type of WoL.
I meant AMT here of course... :/
> Is it possible the bugs being reported against the trusty package are
> due to only part of the implementation being pulled into the patch for
> trusty?
I don't think so, but never say never... I'm going to do a fix for this ASAP
and then we can forget about it.