We could argue forever about whether or not the default is reasonable or not, but that is not the issue as I see it. The Issue is that we provide a way for the list owner to set any message she chooses, and the owner of the specific list in question has not done that. I think your energy would be better spent trying to get the list owner to provide a message you like.
As far as whether the default is appropriate or not, it is true the message is only sent when a non-member post is rejected, but depending on list configuration, it may not be sent for all non-member posts. Thus, a default which says the post is rejected because the poster is not a member could be equally problematic. I don't think the default is bad enough to warrant breaking 35 official Mailman translations to change it.
We could argue forever about whether or not the default is reasonable or not, but that is not the issue as I see it. The Issue is that we provide a way for the list owner to set any message she chooses, and the owner of the specific list in question has not done that. I think your energy would be better spent trying to get the list owner to provide a message you like.
As far as whether the default is appropriate or not, it is true the message is only sent when a non-member post is rejected, but depending on list configuration, it may not be sent for all non-member posts. Thus, a default which says the post is rejected because the poster is not a member could be equally problematic. I don't think the default is bad enough to warrant breaking 35 official Mailman translations to change it.