Comment 18 for bug 1363314

Note that the original offer to upstream was a mailing list discussion and an external git repository, needing a bit more than usual effort from upstream considering they really do not have anyone working on it on paid time.

So please contribute directly to upstream code review system so that they can more easily do the review and acceptance. I found Jim was registered at the codereview site, so I added him now to the Canonical CLA group.

It seems there's a wip/gstreamer-1.0 branch that has just seen first non-merge porting commit for this year: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/q/status:merged+project:qt/qtmultimedia+branch:wip/gstreamer-1.0,n,z - the best way to go forward would probably be submitting the still needed work to that branch, and then submitting that wip branch for merging against dev when suitable, and addressing any upstream concerns.