Log in / Register
OEM Priority Project
Overview
Code
Bugs
Blueprints
Translations
Answers
Bug #1983451
Comment #33
Comment 33 for bug 1983451
Revision history for this message
Mario Limonciello (superm1)
wrote
on 2023-05-17
:
#33
I think it's OK, as it's new symbol should be low risk to be done like this.
I think it's OK, as it's new symbol should be low risk to be done like this.
I think it's OK, as it's new symbol should be low risk to be done like this.