so I'm not sure why you got the impression it was suggesting active/passive. If you can point to the source of the confusion we can try to fix it.
You should also be aware that the HA guide is about to undergo some significant restructuring and improvements which have just been planned here at the PTG:
@Shannon the HA guide already suggests using a load balancer for keystone (and other API services) in an active-active configuration:
https:/ /docs.openstack .org/ha- guide/controlle r-ha-haproxy. html
so I'm not sure why you got the impression it was suggesting active/passive. If you can point to the source of the confusion we can try to fix it.
You should also be aware that the HA guide is about to undergo some significant restructuring and improvements which have just been planned here at the PTG:
https:/ /blueprints. launchpad. net/openstack- manuals/ +spec/implement -ha-guide- todos specs.openstack .org/openstack/ docs-specs/ specs/ocata/ improve- ha-guide. html /etherpad. openstack. org/p/HA_ Guide
http://
https:/