I understand the testing argument, but offering an API to knowingly corrupt the state of the environment feels beyond the use case of juju indeed, and I'd also recomment against adding it to any other tool that is wrapping juju.
It should be easy to create a test-specific tool that uses status to corrupt the state.
I understand the testing argument, but offering an API to knowingly corrupt the state of the environment feels beyond the use case of juju indeed, and I'd also recomment against adding it to any other tool that is wrapping juju.
It should be easy to create a test-specific tool that uses status to corrupt the state.