rohc

  1. Bug #1265304
  2. Comment #13

Comment 13 for bug 1265304

Revision history for this message
Didier Barvaux (didier-barvaux) wrote :

Gil,

(1) To my opinion, this part of the RFC are not strict requirements (MUST in RFC vocabulary), so we may adapt the interface to our needs. Your usage (>= min_value) is indeed difficult to define with a list of discreet values. Another usage I think of is ATM/AAL5 encapsulation: ROHC packets should be (48*N)-8 byte long. We shall find a way to make the API interface handle all those cases fine IMHO.

(2) See http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~didier-barvaux/rohc/main/view/head:/app/sniffer/sniffer.c#L952 + http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~didier-barvaux/rohc/main/view/head:/app/sniffer/sniffer.c#L960 + http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~didier-barvaux/rohc/main/view/head:/app/sniffer/sniffer.c#L1722 for an example of DPI used by the ROHC sniffer.

(3) That would be great ;-)

For next questions, please consider registering to the mailing list (https://launchpad.net/~rohc/+join) and send emails on it. This bugtracker entry is not really a forum ;-)

Didier