Comment 127 for bug 308181

Revision history for this message
In , Jesse-thompson (jesse-thompson) wrote :

> (i.e., the connection is configured to fail if TLS can't be initiated or if the cert doesn't match)

Requiring that certs match the domain will be a show stopper for services that host lots of domains. We are an EDU, and we host 270 domains. Just think about services that host thousands of domains!

Supposing it is practical for email service administrators to maintain hundreds or thousands of valid signed matching certificates for domains that they don't own - it isn't practical, IMHO - do we know if the major MTAs support the ability to present a different cert for the individual domain during the Start-TLS negotiation? If not, that will also be a show stopper.

Is it feasible to abandon plain old TLS? Outlook still seems to work better with port 465/TLS. Start-TLS would be a new requirement since the domain needs to be known before the server can present a matching cert.

Take a look at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hildebrand-dna-00 for some ideas on other methods of asserting domain ownership without the need for DNSSEC.