I'm disappointed that support for SRV's hasn't made it into Mozilla after three
years. There are are very useful device and are now being used by a number of
services: Jabber, LDAP, Kerberos, Windows 2000, etc...
The main reason I want SRV RRs is so I can have multiple SSL Apache virtual
hosts with one IP. Name-based virtual hosts don't work with SSL, but port-based
virtual hosts would :-)
I'm disappointed that support for SRV's hasn't made it into Mozilla after three
years. There are are very useful device and are now being used by a number of
services: Jabber, LDAP, Kerberos, Windows 2000, etc...
The main reason I want SRV RRs is so I can have multiple SSL Apache virtual
hosts with one IP. Name-based virtual hosts don't work with SSL, but port-based
virtual hosts would :-)
This document answers many of the questions asked above about how to go about www.globecom. net/ietf/ draft/draft- andrews- http-srv- 01.html
implimenting http with srv:
http://
It is technically expired, but it's the closest thing to a standard I could find.