Comment 31 for bug 308181

Bugzilla is not a place for creating new RFCs. sorry. You should try NNTP.
also, You are not right, about need of several DNS requests in process of SRV
queries. DNS answer includes "additional" section which already holds the
required data.
for example:

$ host -a -t SRV _irc._tcp.forestnet.org
Trying "_irc._tcp.forestnet.org"
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 5356
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 4

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;_irc._tcp.forestnet.org. IN SRV

;; ANSWER SECTION:
_irc._tcp.forestnet.org. 3600 IN SRV 1 0 6667 irc.forestnet.org.

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
forestnet.org. 3600 IN NS ns1.cwn.ru.
forestnet.org. 3600 IN NS ve208.msm.ru.

;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
irc.forestnet.org. 3600 IN A 81.9.48.3
irc.forestnet.org. 3600 IN A 195.91.162.198
irc.forestnet.org. 3600 IN A 213.248.60.142
ve208.msm.ru. 3600 IN A 213.248.60.142

Received 190 bytes from 192.168.0.1#53 in 725 ms

portability is not a big question too. The libraries which were mentioned
earlier are VERY portable.

p.s. just to clear things up. Rascal is BSD-licensed now:
http://faerion.sourceforge.net/librascal.html.var