Stellarium

  1. Bug #1650757
  2. Comment #7

Comment 7 for bug 1650757

Revision history for this message
Christian Bucher (cbucher) wrote : Re: [Bug 1650757] Re: Visual magnitude of Mercury is wrong
  • Mercury.ods Edit (10.5 KiB, application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.spreadsheet; name="Mercury.ods")

Hello Mr. Wolf

the book i took it from is called "Grundlagen der Ephemeridenrechung" by
Oliver Montenbruck. And he again used formulas based on the Astronomical
Almanac (DE405) and it's "Explenatory Supplement" (1992 edit.). I sent
you the formula as is. I didn't change anything on it! It works. I think
the author used "divided by 100°" because of the phase angle is in °
too. It's the phase angle just divided by 100. I now added a libreoffice
calc to show you what i mean.

Am 17.12.2016 um 17:11 schrieb Alexander Wolf:
> ** Changed in: stellarium
> Importance: Undecided => Low
>