Comment 9 for bug 399988

Actually, I found something what can help:

from the dmesg on the failing computer (it's an old comp, I'm using it kind-of as a server):
[ 0.216109] IP route cache hash table entries: 2048 (order: 1, 8192 bytes)
[ 0.216992] TCP established hash table entries: 8192 (order: 4, 65536 bytes)
[ 0.217207] TCP bind hash table entries: 8192 (order: 4, 65536 bytes)
[ 0.217411] TCP: Hash tables configured (established 8192 bind 8192)
[ 0.217422] TCP reno registered
[ 0.217435] UDP hash table entries: 128 (order: 0, 4096 bytes)
[ 0.217475] UDP-Lite hash table entries: 128 (order: 0, 4096 bytes)

dmesg on my desktop computer:
[ 0.219149] IP route cache hash table entries: 131072 (order: 8, 1048576 bytes)
[ 0.220665] TCP established hash table entries: 524288 (order: 11, 8388608 bytes)
[ 0.224791] TCP bind hash table entries: 65536 (order: 8, 1048576 bytes)
[ 0.225311] TCP: Hash tables configured (established 524288 bind 65536)
[ 0.225314] TCP reno registered
[ 0.225328] UDP hash table entries: 2048 (order: 4, 65536 bytes)
[ 0.225372] UDP-Lite hash table entries: 2048 (order: 4, 65536 bytes)

Clearly, the values on the better computer are way higher than on the other.
Can somebody tell me where I can increase these ?